Exploring the Inter-Relationship of Nature's Constants

jsc314159
Messages
18
Reaction score
1
Hello all.

I only have a few posts here so I am somewhat new to the forum. I have been reading a number of the posts though and I am favorably impressed by many of the responses. I am also somewhat new to LaTex so please forgive my mistakes with it.

I am interested in learning more about the fine structure constant \alpha, where

\alpha = e^2/\hbar c \sim 1/137

e = elementary charge

\hbar = h/2\pi, h is Planck's constant

c = the speed of light in a vacuum

Another way of writing the fine structure constant is

\alpha = \frac{\hbar/mc}{a_0}

m = mass of an electron

a_0 = the Bohr radius

I understand that the fine structure constant is dimensionless and is one of those enigmatic fundamental constants that pops up in the study of nature.

I further understand that it is used in electrodynamics, how? Where else is it used?

What are the leading explanations as to why it exists and why it might take on the value it has?

Does it relate to other numbers like Pi, e, the number of spatial dimensions in the universe?

What do you think?

John
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mzh62
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I didn't know a thread already existed on this topic. I suppose that is what the search function for.

jsc
 
Hello John,

You have laid out the basics for calculating the fine structure constant and may be interested in some further information about the constants of nature given on the website at the following link: (...) - Please read the attachment for my full reply -

... So the inter-linking of the constants seems to be open to expansion in line with specific theories, and the constants themselves appear to be constants of dimension in some cases, providing the mathematical link between expressions of different fields of physics, and in other cases definite parameters to associate with specific body and particle, for example Planck’s constant is the angular momentum of the electron.

Do you John, and others, have some more expressions extending the inter-relationship between the constants of nature?

Adc-fc
 

Attachments

Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top