B What Does the d Represent in Differential Quantities?

AI Thread Summary
The differential "d" in expressions like dE signifies a small change in the quantity E, indicating how E varies with respect to another variable, such as ωi. The notation dE represents the incremental change in energy as ωi is altered by a small amount, dωi. This relationship highlights the sensitivity of E to changes in ωi, allowing for precise calculations in physics. The formula demonstrates that any small adjustment in one variable results in a corresponding change in the other, emphasizing the interconnectedness of these quantities. Understanding this concept is crucial for analyzing physical systems and their behaviors.
Pilpellon
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
[Mentor's note: This question was split off from: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/meaning-of-physical-quantities-and-division.880214/]

What does this differential "d" mean? Why say dE instead of E?
Image.png

or
Image.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you look carefully you'll see that there's a ##d\omega_i## in there as well. This formula is telling you how much ##E## will change (##dE##) if you change ##\omega_i## by a little bit (##d\omega_i##). The actual values of ##E## and ##\omega_i## could be pretty much anything as far as this formula is concerned, but whatever they are, if one them is changed by a small amount the other will change by the small amount calculated from the formula.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top