Exploring Transformers: I^2R Power Losses

AI Thread Summary
Stepping up voltage in transformers reduces current, which minimizes I^2R power losses in transmission cables. While higher voltage could suggest increased power loss, the actual losses depend on the current flowing through the resistance of the wires. The voltage drop across transmission lines is proportional to the current, as described by Ohm's Law (V = IR). Therefore, with reduced current, the voltage drop—and thus the power loss—decreases. Understanding this relationship clarifies how transformers effectively reduce power losses during transmission.
aznking1
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Ok so i was doing my revision for my exams and i was reading on transformers and they said that stepped-up Voltages and stepped-down currents minimizes for tranformers I^2R power losses in the transmission cable. I know that current is decreased, but a higher voltage, by V^2/R, would also mean a greater power loss?

The Attempt at a Solution


I know there have been similar questions like this one below.

physicsforums. com/showthread.php?t=227834( there's a space at the .com cause i can't post links yet)

But i do not understand their reasoning. For example stewartcs said that problem with this line of reasoning is that P = IV is the power delivered by an electrical energy source not the power dissipated by it.

Also the person who asked the question said that he was mixing up the supplied nominal V of the power lines with the V lost by the resistance.

i do not really understand what both of them are saying. can anyone explain it to me? thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
V2/R means the voltage drop at the resistor/appliances NOT the supply voltage.
Less current means less voltage drop whereas the resistance remained.
 
azizlwl said:
V2/R means the voltage drop at the resistor/appliances NOT the supply voltage.
Less current means less voltage drop whereas the resistance remained.

no but if u increase the supply voltage won't the voltage drop across the wires also increase? Like for example you increase the voltage of a battery the voltage drop across the resistor increases
 
aznking1 said:
no but if u increase the supply voltage won't the voltage drop across the wires also increase? Like for example you increase the voltage of a battery the voltage drop across the resistor increases

No, not if you step up the voltage for transmission and step it down again at the other end for delivery to the load; The majority of the voltage drop appears across the transformer windings at each end of the transmission loop. The power lost is the power dissipated in the transmission wires due to the current flowing through the resistance of the transmission wires.

Yes this current produces a voltage drop in that transmission wire resistance, but due to Ohm's Law that voltage drop is proportional to the current: V = IR. If the current is smaller, then the voltage drop will be smaller. You could use this transmission line voltage drop to calculate the power loss with V2/R, but since this voltage drop is due to the CURRENT flowing in the transmission lines, it's more natural to work with the I2R form.
 
gneill said:
No, not if you step up the voltage for transmission and step it down again at the other end for delivery to the load; The majority of the voltage drop appears across the transformer windings at each end of the transmission loop. The power lost is the power dissipated in the transmission wires due to the current flowing through the resistance of the transmission wires.

Yes this current produces a voltage drop in that transmission wire resistance, but due to Ohm's Law that voltage drop is proportional to the current: V = IR. If the current is smaller, then the voltage drop will be smaller. You could use this transmission line voltage drop to calculate the power loss with V2/R, but since this voltage drop is due to the CURRENT flowing in the transmission lines, it's more natural to work with the I2R form.

oh ok thanks for your help i get it now!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top