Exploring Transformers: I^2R Power Losses

AI Thread Summary
Stepping up voltage in transformers reduces current, which minimizes I^2R power losses in transmission cables. While higher voltage could suggest increased power loss, the actual losses depend on the current flowing through the resistance of the wires. The voltage drop across transmission lines is proportional to the current, as described by Ohm's Law (V = IR). Therefore, with reduced current, the voltage drop—and thus the power loss—decreases. Understanding this relationship clarifies how transformers effectively reduce power losses during transmission.
aznking1
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Ok so i was doing my revision for my exams and i was reading on transformers and they said that stepped-up Voltages and stepped-down currents minimizes for tranformers I^2R power losses in the transmission cable. I know that current is decreased, but a higher voltage, by V^2/R, would also mean a greater power loss?

The Attempt at a Solution


I know there have been similar questions like this one below.

physicsforums. com/showthread.php?t=227834( there's a space at the .com cause i can't post links yet)

But i do not understand their reasoning. For example stewartcs said that problem with this line of reasoning is that P = IV is the power delivered by an electrical energy source not the power dissipated by it.

Also the person who asked the question said that he was mixing up the supplied nominal V of the power lines with the V lost by the resistance.

i do not really understand what both of them are saying. can anyone explain it to me? thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
V2/R means the voltage drop at the resistor/appliances NOT the supply voltage.
Less current means less voltage drop whereas the resistance remained.
 
azizlwl said:
V2/R means the voltage drop at the resistor/appliances NOT the supply voltage.
Less current means less voltage drop whereas the resistance remained.

no but if u increase the supply voltage won't the voltage drop across the wires also increase? Like for example you increase the voltage of a battery the voltage drop across the resistor increases
 
aznking1 said:
no but if u increase the supply voltage won't the voltage drop across the wires also increase? Like for example you increase the voltage of a battery the voltage drop across the resistor increases

No, not if you step up the voltage for transmission and step it down again at the other end for delivery to the load; The majority of the voltage drop appears across the transformer windings at each end of the transmission loop. The power lost is the power dissipated in the transmission wires due to the current flowing through the resistance of the transmission wires.

Yes this current produces a voltage drop in that transmission wire resistance, but due to Ohm's Law that voltage drop is proportional to the current: V = IR. If the current is smaller, then the voltage drop will be smaller. You could use this transmission line voltage drop to calculate the power loss with V2/R, but since this voltage drop is due to the CURRENT flowing in the transmission lines, it's more natural to work with the I2R form.
 
gneill said:
No, not if you step up the voltage for transmission and step it down again at the other end for delivery to the load; The majority of the voltage drop appears across the transformer windings at each end of the transmission loop. The power lost is the power dissipated in the transmission wires due to the current flowing through the resistance of the transmission wires.

Yes this current produces a voltage drop in that transmission wire resistance, but due to Ohm's Law that voltage drop is proportional to the current: V = IR. If the current is smaller, then the voltage drop will be smaller. You could use this transmission line voltage drop to calculate the power loss with V2/R, but since this voltage drop is due to the CURRENT flowing in the transmission lines, it's more natural to work with the I2R form.

oh ok thanks for your help i get it now!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top