Exponent Expression Help: Understanding 0^√0 = √0⁰ and Its Truth Value

AI Thread Summary
The expression 0^{\sqrt{0}} = \sqrt{0^{0}} is debated regarding its truth value, largely hinging on the definition of 0^0, which can be considered either 1 or undefined. If 0^0 is deemed undefined, the expression does not hold true. The discussion includes attempts to simplify the expression using logarithms, but it is clarified that log(0) is also undefined, complicating the analysis. Participants emphasize the importance of definitions and assumptions in mathematical proofs. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that without a clear definition of 0^0, the expression cannot be definitively validated.
ritwik06
Messages
577
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


0^{\sqrt{0}}=\sqrt{0^{0}}

Is this expression true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If you consider "undefined = undefined" to be true, then yes.
 


That depends on your view... 0^0 can be defined as 1, or it can be undefined.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Zero_to_the_zero_powerEither way, I think if you define 0^0 as undefined then the expression above does not hold... That would also mean 1/0 = 0^0 which I think doesn't really make sense... I'm not sure on this but I don't think you can say undefined = undefined!
 


Take logarithm and simplify.

root 0 * log 0 = 0 *1= 0

Assumptions= using root 0= 0 on the basis that zero is a real number.
Taking log to the base 10.

R.H.S.> 1/2*0 * log 0
> 0*1
> 0

Assumptions same as above.

The points raised above by honourable members are very meaningful, this is one of the proof methods i learned at the IIT,delhi.
 


physixguru said:
Take logarithm and simplify.

root 0 * log 0 = 0 *1= 0
?? log(0) is NOT 1. It is, one more time, "undefined".
(log(1)= 0, not the other way around.)

Assumptions= using root 0= 0 on the basis that zero is a real number.
Taking log to the base 10.

R.H.S.> 1/2*0 * log 0
> 0*1
> 0

Assumptions same as above.

The points raised above by honourable members are very meaningful, this is one of the proof methods i learned at the IIT,delhi.
 


It was a bad typing error.
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top