Exponential/Continuous Distributions

  • Thread starter Thread starter whitehorsey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distributions
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating probabilities and expected values related to radioactive gas emissions from a nuclear plant, which occur on average twice a month. Participants address the probability of at least three months passing before the first emission, with calculations leading to confusion over negative results due to misinterpretation of continuous versus discrete distributions. The correct approach involves recognizing that the time until the first emission follows an exponential distribution, where the rate parameter 'a' is determined to be 0.5. The final calculations yield a probability of approximately 0.223 for waiting more than three months and an expected wait time of 2 months for the first emission. Understanding the relationship between Poisson and exponential distributions is emphasized as crucial for solving such problems accurately.
whitehorsey
Messages
188
Reaction score
0
1. A particular nuclear plant releases a detectable amount of radioactive gases twice a month on the average. Find the probability that at least 3 months will elapse before the release of the first detectable emission. What is the average time that one must wait to observe the first emission?


2. P[X ≤ x] = 1 - e-αx


3. Find the probability that at least 3 months will elapse before the release of the first detectable emission.
P[T ≥ 3] = 1 - P[T ≤ 2]
= 1 - (1 - e-.5(2)) - (1 - e-.5(1)) - (1 - e-.5(0))
= -0.0256
I ended up getting a negative number which shouldn't happen but I'm not sure what's wrong.


What is the average time that one must wait to observe the first emission?
P[T = 1] = 1 - e-.5(1)
= 0.3935?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The negative number appeared since you are considering the distribution to be discrete when it's not. P(T<=3) = 1 - P(T<3) = 1-P(T<=3) since the distribution is continuous.

In 2. I think you are not calculating what you think you are... First of all P(T=1) = P(X<=1)-P(X<1) = 0.
You really are computing P(T<=1). Makes sense?

As for the average time before the first emission can't say I am entirely sure. I'd go for 0.5 months since the "nuclear plant releases a detectable amount of radioactive gases twice a month, on the average".
Don't trust me 100% on this one though, it's been quite a while since I've taken nuclear physics.
 
whitehorsey said:
1. A particular nuclear plant releases a detectable amount of radioactive gases twice a month on the average. Find the probability that at least 3 months will elapse before the release of the first detectable emission. What is the average time that one must wait to observe the first emission?


2. P[X ≤ x] = 1 - e-αx


3. Find the probability that at least 3 months will elapse before the release of the first detectable emission.
P[T ≥ 3] = 1 - P[T ≤ 2]
= 1 - (1 - e-.5(2)) - (1 - e-.5(1)) - (1 - e-.5(0))
= -0.0256
I ended up getting a negative number which shouldn't happen but I'm not sure what's wrong.


What is the average time that one must wait to observe the first emission?
P[T = 1] = 1 - e-.5(1)
= 0.3935?

What is the course context of this problem? Are you taking (or have taken) material about Poisson processes, exponential distributions and the link between exponential and Poisson? If so, this is a simple application of standard formulas; if not, you have a lot of reading to do. Your solution gets almost everything wrong, and it is hard to know where to begin without having you answer my questions above.
 
To answer your questions: The course context is continuous distributions. I have learned about Poisson for discrete and this problem comes from the exponential distribution section. As for the link between Poisson and exponential, I'm not really sure what ties them together besides the β in exponential density formula equals 1/λ and λ is Poisson parameter.

Rikardus said:
The negative number appeared since you are considering the distribution to be discrete when it's not. P(T<=3) = 1 - P(T<3) = 1-P(T<=3) since the distribution is continuous.

In 2. I think you are not calculating what you think you are... First of all P(T=1) = P(X<=1)-P(X<1) = 0.
You really are computing P(T<=1). Makes sense?

As for the average time before the first emission can't say I am entirely sure. I'd go for 0.5 months since the "nuclear plant releases a detectable amount of radioactive gases twice a month, on the average".
Don't trust me 100% on this one though, it's been quite a while since I've taken nuclear physics.

Oh! So looking at the formula again I got this:
P[T ≤ 3] = 1 - (1 - e-.5(3))
= 0.7769

Part 2:
I got 2 because its asking for average so that means the mean (E[X])?
 
Last edited:
whitehorsey said:
To answer your questions: The course context is continuous distributions. I have learned about Poisson for discrete and this problem comes from the exponential distribution section. As for the link between Poisson and exponential, I'm not really sure what ties them together besides the β in exponential density formula equals 1/λ and λ is Poisson parameter.



Oh! So looking at the formula again I got this:
P[T ≤ 3] = 1 - (1 - e-.5(3))
= 0.7769

Part 2:
I got 2 because its asking for average so that means the mean (E[X])?

Notation is just notation, so whether you have β or 1/λ does not matter; what matters is *meaning* and *use*. So, in this type of situation there are two types of random variables occurring: (i) N--- a count of the number of 'events' occurring in spans of time (for example, the number of releases in a month); and (ii) T---a time between successive events (for example, the time until the first event, or the time between event 1 and event 2). You need to keep them separate, although they are closely related.

So, if you have Poisson-distributed number of events, with the distribution of the number N(t) in time span (0,t) given by
p_k(t) \equiv P(N(t) = k) = \frac{(at)^k}{k!} e^{-at}, \; k = 0, 1, 2, \ldots
then the mean number is ##E N = at.## We call 'a' the *rate* parameter---you may have seen it called λ or μ or some other Greek letter, but that does not matter.

So, how does this relate to T (the time until an event occurs)? Look at ##p_0(t)##, which is the probability that NO event happens in the interval (0,t). That means that the time of the first event is later than t; that is, if T_1 is the time until the first event, we have
\{ N(t) = 0 \} = \{ \text{no events in }(0,t) \} = \{ T_1 \:&gt; t \}.
Therefore, ##P(T_1 > t) = p_0(t) = e^{-at},## and that means that ##T_1## has an exponential distribution with mean ##1/a##, and probability density function
f_{T_1}(t) = a e^{-at} 1\{t &gt; 0 \},
where ##1\{ t > 0 \}## is the indicator function of the set ##\{ t > 0 \} ##.

It turns out that the inter-event times are ##T_1, T_2, T_3, \ldots## are independent and have the same distribution as ##T_1##; that is, they are all exponentially distributed with mean 1/a.

In your problem you are told the mean of N(1), so you can figure out the value of 'a'. You are asked to get P(T1 > 3) and E(T1).
 
Ray Vickson said:
Notation is just notation, so whether you have β or 1/λ does not matter; what matters is *meaning* and *use*. So, in this type of situation there are two types of random variables occurring: (i) N--- a count of the number of 'events' occurring in spans of time (for example, the number of releases in a month); and (ii) T---a time between successive events (for example, the time until the first event, or the time between event 1 and event 2). You need to keep them separate, although they are closely related.
...

In your problem you are told the mean of N(1), so you can figure out the value of 'a'. You are asked to get P(T1 > 3) and E(T1).

I think I got it. Would 'a' be .5?

P(T1 > 3) = e-.5(3) = 0.22313016
E(T1) = 2
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K