Exponential distribution likelihood

Merka
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In general what do you do when some kind of data is missing from some data that follows exponential distribution. For example, say 3 observations are made by an instrument where x1=5, x2=3, but for x3 the instrument can not give a specific answer because it can't measure past 10. So the only info we have about x3 is that x3>10. How can we come up with a likelihood function of lambda for this data (which is exponential distributed)? do we just use x3=10, or what?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is censored data (since we know there were 3 observations):

do the likelihood function as follows:

f(5)*f(3)*(1 - F(10))
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top