Exponential law and complex numbers

Positronized
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I was playing around with complex exponentials and came to this result:

$\begin{eqnarray*}<br /> e^{\frac{2\pi i}{5}}&amp;=&amp;e^\left(\frac{2}{5}\right)\left(\pi i\right)\\<br /> &amp;=&amp;\left(e^{\pi i}\right)^{\frac{2}{5}}\\<br /> &amp;=&amp;\left(-1\right)^{\frac{2}{5}}\\<br /> &amp;=&amp;1\end{eqnarray*}$

But obviously e^{\frac{2\pi i}{5}}=\mathrm{cos}\frac{2\pi}{5}+i \mathrm{sin}\frac{2\pi}{5}\approx 0.309+0.951i\neq 1

So after some research I found that the exponential law a^{mn}=\left(a^{m}\right)^{n} is only true when a,m,n\in\mathbb{R} and not otherwise.

My question now is WHY does the index law fail for imaginary base/exponents?

Thanks!

*PS how can I get rid of that (0) appearing after the eqnarray in my $\LaTeX$ code above?? :P
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Because dealing only in real numbers, questions like "the fifth root of 1" is easy, its just 1. However with complex numbers we know that there are 5 solutions, and 1 is the only real one, the rest are imaginary. I think you will find that exp( 2*pi*i /5) is one of the roots =]
 
Positronized said:
So after some research I found that the exponential law a^{mn}=\left(a^{m}\right)^{n} is only true when a,m,n\in\mathbb{R} and not otherwise.
In fact, the rule does work for all a,m,n\in\mathbb{C} but only by extending the complex plane using an infinite number of branch cuts and planes. The logarithm rule works in this way as well. The rule will fail if you are only using one "copy" of the complex plane.

The rule does work in your example as well. (-1)^2 = 1, and one of the fifth roots of 1 is indeed e^{\frac{2\pi i}{5}}. In fact, in the branced complex plane, this is the only fifth root of the 1 in question, as in the branched plane, roots are no longer multivalued.

It's all very confusing at first, but you'll get used to it.
 
Positronized, the awnser to your question is simple. The first expression you wrote, is equivalent to the second one. The only error you did was not to take the "magnitude" of your complexe number, this is the awnser you are looking for. All you do is:

Magnitude = ((Real)^2 + (Img)^2)^0.5

So, in your case, you find:

Magnitude = (Cos(2*pi/5)^2 + Sin(2*pi/5)^2)^0.5 = 1^0.5 = 1 hence the two methods you used are equivilent.

I suggest you go read wiki for any basic questions on complexe numbers.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top