Exponents & Mods: What You Need to Know

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sam Anderson
  • Start date Start date
Sam Anderson
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Could somebody at least tell me about mods in exponents?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sam Anderson said:
Let 3^n denote 333... (n+1 threes in total)

Tetration already has a formalized expression.

^n3=3^{3^{...^3}} with n 3's in the stack.

Or you can even use Knuth's up arrow notation. Exponentiation is denoted by 1 up arrow, and tetration by 2, so

^n3 = 3\uparrow\uparrow n

So what's your question?
 
Mentallic said:
Tetration already has a formalized expression.

^n3=3^{3^{...^3}} with n 3's in the stack.

Or you can even use Knuth's up arrow notation. Exponentiation is denoted by 1 up arrow, and tetration by 2, so

^n3 = 3\uparrow\uparrow n

So what's your question?
Thanks for the quick reply, but I wasn't finished typing. I accidentally hit enter. Sorry.
 
Sam Anderson said:
Could somebody at least tell me about mods in exponents?

I could only guess what you're asking for, but if I were to guess, say you want to prove that ^n3 \mod 10 = 7, n>1 we would do an inductive proof. I'll make it short and you can fill in the details, but essentially you start with the base case 3^3 = 27 hence 27 \mod 10 = 7 and we can then show by calculation that 3^7 \mod 10 = 7 hence it must be true for all n.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top