Exponents & Mods: What You Need to Know

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sam Anderson
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding modular arithmetic in the context of exponents and tetration, specifically regarding the expression ^n3, which represents a power tower of threes. Tetration is formally expressed as 3^{3^{...^3}} with n threes, and Knuth's up arrow notation is used to denote this operation. A participant suggests using induction to prove that ^n3 mod 10 equals 7 for n greater than 1, starting with the base case of 3^3. The proof involves showing that the pattern holds for subsequent powers. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between modular arithmetic and exponentiation in advanced mathematical contexts.
Sam Anderson
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Could somebody at least tell me about mods in exponents?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sam Anderson said:
Let 3^n denote 333... (n+1 threes in total)

Tetration already has a formalized expression.

^n3=3^{3^{...^3}} with n 3's in the stack.

Or you can even use Knuth's up arrow notation. Exponentiation is denoted by 1 up arrow, and tetration by 2, so

^n3 = 3\uparrow\uparrow n

So what's your question?
 
Mentallic said:
Tetration already has a formalized expression.

^n3=3^{3^{...^3}} with n 3's in the stack.

Or you can even use Knuth's up arrow notation. Exponentiation is denoted by 1 up arrow, and tetration by 2, so

^n3 = 3\uparrow\uparrow n

So what's your question?
Thanks for the quick reply, but I wasn't finished typing. I accidentally hit enter. Sorry.
 
Sam Anderson said:
Could somebody at least tell me about mods in exponents?

I could only guess what you're asking for, but if I were to guess, say you want to prove that ^n3 \mod 10 = 7, n>1 we would do an inductive proof. I'll make it short and you can fill in the details, but essentially you start with the base case 3^3 = 27 hence 27 \mod 10 = 7 and we can then show by calculation that 3^7 \mod 10 = 7 hence it must be true for all n.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top