Express E due to a point charge at the origin

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing the electric field E due to a point charge q at the origin in cylindrical polar coordinates. The electric field in spherical coordinates is given as E = q / (4πε₀r²) in the radial direction. To convert this to cylindrical coordinates, the participants clarify that the radial component corresponds to Eₗ, while the angular and vertical components are zero. The conversion process is emphasized as straightforward, particularly noting that the z-coordinate remains unchanged between Cartesian and cylindrical systems. The final expression for the electric field in cylindrical coordinates is confirmed as E = (q / (4πε₀r²)) ê_r + 0 ê_φ + 0 ê_z.
leeban7
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Express the electric field E due to a point charge q at the origin in cylindrical polar coordinates.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Know that E = q / 4*pi*epsilon_0*r^2 in the r-direction, which is the answer in spherical coordinates. How we we swap to cylindrical?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello leeban, :welcome:

Same as when we would have to change to Cartesian coordinates:
We simply express the ##\vec E## in terms of ##E_\rho##, ##E_\phi## and ##E_z## :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes leeban7
Do you recommend swapping to Cartesian and then to cylindrical? I know the linear transforms for those, but not from spherical to cylindrical
 
I do not recommend that. For one, you already have that ##\phi## in the one is equal to ##\phi## in the other system (*)
And for the ##z##, yes, you have to do that, because Cartesian ##z## = cylindrical ##z##.
And from ##r## to ##\rho## is a breeze.

(*) you want to beware that those stupid mathematicians chose to confuse everyone by swapping ##\theta## and ##\phi##

[edit] proof of this claim: check out how wikipedia makes a mess of your exercise.
 
Last edited:
leeban7 said:
which is the answer in spherical coordinates
Not the full answer, though ! You only mention ##E_r## :rolleyes:
 
Due to symmetry isn't the electric field on dependant on r?
 
The magnitude is, yes. But ##\vec E## is a vector: it also has a direction (along ##\hat r##) and you only give the radial component without stating the other two.
 
Would I be correct in then saying that
\vec E = q/4*pi*epsilon_0*r^2 \hat r + 0 \hat omega + 0 \hat phi
 
leeban7 said:
Would I be correct in then saying that
$$\vec E = {q\over 4\pi\varepsilon_0 r^2} \, \hat r + 0 \, \hat \phi + 0 \, \hat \theta$$
Yes, that (somewhat edited * :smile: ) is the full expression I hinted at. Hopefully makes it easier for you to convert to cylindrical.

* $$\vec E = {q\over 4\pi\varepsilon_0 r^2} \, \hat r + 0 \, \hat \phi + 0 \, \hat \theta$$
 
Back
Top