Express the area under the curve y=x5 from 0 to 2 as a limit

  • Thread starter Thread starter tony873004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Curve Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around expressing the area under the curve y=x^5 from 0 to 2 as a limit. Participants are exploring the formulation of this limit using Riemann sums and questioning various aspects of their expressions and calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different forms of the limit expression, including the original poster's attempt and suggestions for using Riemann sums. Questions arise about the placement of variables and the interpretation of the summation limits.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on how to express the area using rectangles and questioning the assumptions made in the original expressions. Some participants have clarified the relationship between the width and height of the rectangles, while others are still grappling with the simplification of the summation.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of confusion regarding the summation of powers and the implications of dividing the interval into equal parts. The original poster also notes a lack of familiarity with certain concepts due to differences in coursework coverage.

tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143
Welcome to my first of many questions. :rolleyes:

Express the area under the curve y=x5 from 0 to 2 as a limit.

My guess based on class notes:
[tex] \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \sum\limits_{i = 0}^2 {\left( {x_i^* } \right)} ^5 \Delta x[/tex]

Back of the book:
[tex] \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \frac{{64}}{{n^6 }}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {i^5 } [/tex]

What am I missing??
where did [tex]\frac{{64}}{{n^6 }}[/tex] come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your expression has [itex]\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}[/itex] but there is no n in the expression itself.
 
how about
[tex] \mathop {\lim }\limits_{\Delta x \to 0} \sum\limits_{i = 0}^2 {\left( {x_i^* } \right)} ^5 \Delta x[/tex]
 
tony873004 said:
[tex] \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \frac{{64}}{{n^6 }}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {i^5 } [/tex]
You want to sum up rectangles on the interval (0, 2) that approximate the function. Your book has chosen to divide up the interval into equal-spaced rectangles. The locations of the edges of their rectangles are
0, 2/n, 4/n, 6/n, ... 2n/n
(Do you see how this evenly divides up the interval (0, 2)?)
For each rectangle, they want to multiply its width by its height to get its area.
-What are the widths of these rectangles?

The height of each rectangle is the value of the function at some point on the interval of the base of the rectangle. In this case they chose the rightmost points of these intervals, i.e.
2/n, 4/n, ... 2n/n
-How can you express the i'th number in this sequence?
-What is the value of the function--the heights of the rectangles--at the i'th point in the sequence?
-What is the area of the i'th rectangle?

Then they want to sum up the areas of the n rectangles.
-What is that sum?

Then they take the limit as n goes to infinity, so that the rectangles get finer and finer and more closely approximate the function's area.
-How do they simplify it to their final answer?
 
Last edited:
0rthodontist said:
...-What are the widths of these rectangles
The widths of the rectangles would be (2-0) / n = 2/n

0rthodontist said:
-What is the value of the function--the heights of the rectangles--at the i'th point in the sequence?

This is where I get confused. If I express it as "i" and I break it into 1000 intervals, then I'd be including 1000^5 in my sumation, which would clearly be wrong since 2^5 should be the largest thing I include in my sumation. I'd have to express that it as "x". Since (b-a) is 2, each "x" would represent i*2/n
0rthodontist said:
-What is the area of the i'th rectangle?
so this should be (i*2/n)^5 * (2/n)

0rthodontist said:
Then they want to sum up the areas of the n rectangles.
-What is that sum?

[tex]\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\left( {\frac{{2i}}{n}} \right)^5 \frac{2}{n}}[/tex]

0rthodontist said:
Then they take the limit as n goes to infinity, so that the rectangles get finer and finer and more closely approximate the function's area.
[tex] \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\left( {\frac{{2i}}{n}} \right)^5 \frac{2}{n}} [/tex]

0rthodontist said:
-How do they simplify it to their final answer?
not a clue
 
tony873004 said:
The widths of the rectangles would be (2-0) / n = 2/n
yep


This is where I get confused. If I express it as "i" and I break it into 1000 intervals, then I'd be including 1000^5 in my sumation, which would clearly be wrong since 2^5 should be the largest thing I include in my sumation. I'd have to express that it as "x". Since (b-a) is 2, each "x" would represent i*2/n
The thing is that you might have 1000^5 in the numerator, but if you break (0, 2) into 1000 intervals, your denominator--which depends on the number of intervals, n--will also be large.

so this should be (i*2/n)^5 * (2/n)
Right. Actually, isolate the part of this that corresponds to the height of the rectangle and try plugging in some values for n and i--you should see for yourself that it won't exceed 2^5 = 32 so long as i <= n.


[tex]\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\left( {\frac{{2i}}{n}} \right)^5 \frac{2}{n}}[/tex]


[tex] \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\left( {\frac{{2i}}{n}} \right)^5 \frac{2}{n}} [/tex]

-How do they simplify it to their final answer?
not a clue
Well, you have everything right up until now. What can you do inside the summation just using algebra? Then since n doesn't depend on i, if you have a factor that only involves n you can bring it outside the summation.
 
Last edited:
[tex] \begin{array}{l}<br /> \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\left( {\frac{{2i}}{n}} \right)^5 \frac{2}{n}} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\frac{{2^5 i^5 }}{{n^5 }} \cdot \frac{2}{n}} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\frac{{32i^5 }}{{n^5 }} \cdot \frac{2}{n}} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\frac{{64i^5 }}{{n^6 }}} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \frac{{64}}{{n^6 }}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {i^5 } \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]
Thanks for stepping me through that. Intuitively I get the concept. It only took me about 3 minutes to get the actual answer for the area by writing a short computer program:
Code:
Private Sub Command1_Click()
    a = 0 'starting x value
    b = 2 'ending x value
    n = Val(Text2.Text) 'experiment with different numbers of intervals
    t = 0
    deltaN = (b - a) / n 'width of each interval
    
    For k = a To b Step deltaN 'sum it up
        t = t + deltaN * k ^ 5 ' width * height of each interval
    Next k
    
    Text1.Text = t 'output the answer
End Sub

Part (b) of this question is "use a computer algebra system to find the sum in your expression from part (a)." I would have guessed that this meant to come up with an answer, such as 10.667, like I got from the above program provided n was large. But the back of the book gives [tex] \frac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)^2 \left( {2n^2 + 2n - 1} \right)}}{{12}}[/tex]
So I guess when they say "find the sum" they mean find an equation, not find the answer?

For the equation, I would have guessed
[tex]\frac{{64}}{{n^6 }}\left( {1^5 + 2^5 + 3^5 + ...n^5 } \right)<br /> \][/tex].

I don't see anything in the book that shows how to do it their way. Is that because it
s too complicated to do by hand, hence their instruction to use the computer? Or is this something I should have remembered from algebra class? What should I look up to review this kind of problem?

Finally, part (c) of this question is "Evaluate the limit in part (a)". The back of the book gives 32/3, which agrees nicely with the 10.6667 I got using the compute program. But how would I do it their way to get the answer in fraction form?

Most people in our class took Calc I at SFSU using the same textbook. I took Calc I at the community college. We didn't cover sumations or integration or differentiation of trig functions, so everyone else is two chapters ahead of me. This question wasn't even an assigned homework question. It was just a question I picked at random from the previous chapter in an effort to catch up to the rest of the class.

so... stay tuned for more q's :)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K