Exterior Schwarzschild Spacetime Defined

Sasha_Tw
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
The Schwarzschild spacetime is defined by the following line element
\begin{equation*}
ds^2 = - \left( 1 - \frac{2m}{r} \right)dt^2 + \frac{1}{1-\frac{2m}{r}}dr^2 + r^2 d\theta^2 + r^2\sin \theta^2 d\phi^2.
\end{equation*}
We can use the isotropic coordinates, obtained from the Schwarzschild coordinates by the following transformation
\begin{equation*}
r = \overline{r}\left( 1 + \frac{m}{2\overline{r}}\right)^2
\end{equation*}
to obtain a new form for the Schwarzschild metric given by
\begin{equation*}
ds^2 = -\left( \frac{\overline{r} - \frac{m}{2}}{\overline{r}+\frac{m}{2}} \right)^2dt^2 +
\left( \frac{\overline{r} + \frac{m}{2}}{\overline{r}}\right)^4(d\overline{r}^2 + \overline{r}^2d\Omega^2),
\end{equation*}
where $\Omega = d\theta^2 + \sin \theta^2d\phi^2$.

I read in various books that the exterior Schwarzschild spacetime is defined as follows
\begin{equation*}
\left( \mathbb{R} \times (\mathbb{R}^3 \setminus B_{m/2}(0), (1 + \frac{m}{2|x|})^4 (dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2) - \left( \frac{1-\frac{m}{2|x|}}{1 + \frac{m}{2|x|}} \right)^2 dt^2 \right)
\end{equation*}
with $|x| = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2}$.

I don't understand how we obtained the last form ? Why are we considering the manifold to be specifically $\mathbb{R} \times (\mathbb{R}^3 \setminus B_{m/2}(0)$ and why did the $d\Omega^2$ term disappear ?
thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sasha_Tw said:
Why are we considering the manifold to be specifically ##\mathbb{R} \times (\mathbb{R}^3 \setminus B_{m/2}(0)##

Because this is the exterior by definition, i.e., the space-time outside of the event horizon.

Sasha_Tw said:
and why did the ##d\Omega^2## term disappear ?

It did not, it is just a transformation from spherical to linear coordinates, ##dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 = dr^2 + r^2d\Omega^2##.

Edit: Oh, and you cannot use $ for LaTeX in text, please use ## or the itex tags instead.
 
  • Like
Likes bcrowell
Orodruin said:
Because this is the exterior by definition, i.e., the space-time outside of the event horizon.
It did not, it is just a transformation from spherical to linear coordinates, ##dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 = dr^2 + r^2d\Omega^2##.

Edit: Oh, and you cannot use $ for LaTeX in text, please use ## or the itex tags instead.
Thanks for the response! Concerning the exterior region, is it asymptotically flat ? I am not too familiar with those notions in general but I was reading that for an asymptotically flat manifold, we would have the end of the manifold diffeomorphic to ##\mathbb{R}^3 \setminus K## where ##K## is a compact and this is exactly the form we have
 
Sasha_Tw said:
Thanks for the response! Concerning the exterior region, is it asymptotically flat ?

Yes. The Schwarzschild spacetime is the prototypical example of an asymptotically flat spacetime.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
290
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Back
Top