Extract the angle polar numbers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around extracting the angle from a polar equation related to synchronous generator excitation currents. The original equation presented by the user contained a typo, which was clarified to represent polar notation correctly. The calculations led to the conclusion that the angle x equals approximately -60.84 degrees for the current Ia. Participants confirmed the validity of the calculations, emphasizing the importance of complex number multiplication in this context. The final results aligned closely with the expected values, validating the approach taken.
commelion
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
hi

can anybody advise on this, need to find the angle out of the following

2300=2000+(0.5<x).(4<90)

got as far as

300/4<90 = 0.5<x

= 75<90= 0.5<x

is this correct and anybody able to finish this off

regards
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What is 4<90 and 0.5<x ?
 
I think he means polar notation

a \angle ω = a ( cos ω + j . sin ω )

but the OP formula seems to have a typo of some kind; the only expression I can imagine that makes sense is this

2300 = 2000 . ( 0.5 \angle x ) . ( 4 \angle 90 )
= 2000 . 0.5 . 4 cos ( 90 - x )

x = 35.0996°

May be that, or not...
 
Last edited:
hi yes it is polar notation, got my notation and common sense mixed up (late one last night)

the equation repersents the excitation current angle of a sychronous generator, ( Ia ∠ x ) stands for stator amps at some angle

(2300∠ 15 ) = (1154.7∠ 0) + ( Ia ∠ x ) . ( 4 ∠ 90 )

can some check if

( Ia ∠ x ) = ((2300∠ 15 ) - (1154.7∠ 0) / ( 4 ∠ 90 ))

= (305.4∠-61)

can someone confirm this for me please, if I am wrong please correct ?
 
ah, it's Ia instead of 4... 4 would never get a valid value... that makes sense now; also, if I remember electrics right, you're doing a complex number multiplication, not a vector inner product... so ( a ∠ b ) . ( c ∠ d ) is (ab) ∠ (b+d)... instead of (ab) ∠ (b-d) as I wrote above

so

(2300 < 15) = (1154.7 < 0 ) + ( I < x ) . ( 4 < 90 )
(2221.63 + j 595.28) - ( 1154.7 + j 0 ) = ( I < x ) . ( 4 < 90 )
(1066.93 + j 595.28 ) / ( 4 < 90 ) = ( I < x )
( 1221.76 < 29.16 ) / ( 4 < 90 ) = ( I < x )
( 305.44 < -60.84 ) = ( I < x )

it looks good; confirming result with my trusty Texas calculator:

(2300 < 15) = (1154.7 < 0 ) + ( 305.44 < -60.84 ) . ( 4 < 90 )
(2300 < 15) = (1154.7 < 0 ) + ( 1221.76 < 29.16 )
(2300 < 15) = (2299.99 < 15)
 
thanks for that


regards
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top