F = ma Exam 2011 # 12 (Gravitational Attraction of Rods and Balls)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving gravitational attraction between balls and rods. The scenario presents two configurations: one with two balls at the ends of a rod and another with three balls and rods forming an equilateral triangle. The key question is determining the compressive force in each rod when arranged in the triangle. Despite initial confusion regarding vector components and force calculations, the consensus is that the compressive force in each rod remains F, as the gravitational forces acting on the balls balance out. The correct answer to the problem is confirmed to be C, indicating that the forces acting through the rods do not change with the arrangement.
SignaturePF
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


12. You are given a large collection of identical heavy balls and lightweight rods. When two balls are placed at the ends
of one rod and interact through their mutual gravitational attraction (as is shown on the left), the compressive
force in the rod is F. Next, three balls and three rods are placed at the vertexes and edges of an equilateral triangle
(as is shown on the right). What is the compressive force in each rod in the latter case?
(A) √1/3F
(B)√3 / 2 F
(C) F
(D)√3F
(E) 2F

The correct answer is C


Homework Equations


F_g = GmM / r^2


The Attempt at a Solution


Why is the force still F?
Is it because the only force that the rod has to equal in magnitude is the gravitational acceleration between two balls at a time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take a look at the top ball on the triangle - what is the total force on it?
What proportion of that force goes along each rod?
 
The top ball has Force Gm^2 / R^2 (where R is length of triangle) on the left
same on the right. We'll call this force F, as done in the problem.
However, when these two forces are added the x components of each cancel out, leaving the net force as:
F_net = 2Fsin60
F_net = root(3)F
so each rod will face root(3)/2F, where did I go wrong?
 
You did the proportions back to front.
Draw the vectors on the diagram.
 
I don't follow what you mean. When I draw the vectors on the diagram I get the same result.
 
Surely you get a vector of magnitude F pointing along one rod and another vector of magnitude F pointing along the other rod - the total force being the sum of these vectors?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top