F = MA Exam 2012 # 23 (Measuring local gravitational acceleration)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying which sets of equipment can be used to measure the local gravitational acceleration (g). Participants are evaluating various combinations of tools and methods to determine their effectiveness in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants analyze different setups, questioning the utility of specific equipment such as spring scales, inclined planes, and motors. There is a focus on the reasoning behind eliminating certain options based on their understanding of physics principles.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering insights into the reasoning behind their eliminations and questioning the assumptions related to the setups. Some participants have provided alternative interpretations of how certain equipment might be utilized, while others are still uncertain about specific details.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential constraints, such as the lack of known lengths in some setups and the implications of using different masses in experiments. Participants are also considering the conditions under which the equipment might be deemed ineffective for measuring g.

SignaturePF
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Which of the following sets of equipment cannot be used to measure the local value of the acceleration due to
gravity (g)?
(A) A spring scale (which reads in force units) and a known mass.
(B) A rod of known length, an unknown mass, and a stopwatch.
(C) An inclined plane of known inclination, several carts of different known masses, and a stopwatch.←
CORRECT
(D) A launcher which launches projectiles at a known speed, a projectile of known mass, and a meter stick.
(E) A motor with a known output power, a known mass, a piece of string of unknown length, and a stopwatch

The Attempt at a Solution


I eliminated A because that is a fundamental way to measure gravity, as a scale reads normal force. Simply place an object on flat ground where Normal force = mg, divide the known normal force by the known mass, and we have gravity.
I eliminated B since we can use uniform accelerated motion.
Δy = v_0t + 1/2at^2
since v_0 = 0
Δy = 1/2at^2, we also know t, so clearly we can find a
C I believed you could find, I'm not sure why you can't.
D I thought you could use projectile motion equations.
E I'm not sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With C, having carts of several different masses is not that useful, because every mass will take the same time to get from the top of the incline to the bottom. The time depends only on the length of the incline, the inclination angle, and the acceleration due to gravity. So you really only need one cart, but you must also know the length of the incline. Perhaps you are meant to assume that you do NOT know this (because you have no metre stick)?
 
For E, maybe you are supposed to try and wind the string (with mass hanging from it) onto the motor shaft at a constant speed, and since P = Fv, if you know v, you can find F, which is equal to mg (since the speed is constant, the lifting force must be balancing the weight). The thing I don't get is how you're supposed to get v with just a stopwatch and no known lengths. EDIT: Are you sure it wasn't a piece of string of *known* length?
 
Last edited:
For E, you can use the motor and the stopwatch to deliver a known KE. Knowing the mass that tells you the speed. Use that to launch the mass vertically and time it to top of trajectory.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K