F:R->R, the fourth derivative of f is continuous for all x

sdff22
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
F:R-->R, the fourth derivative of f is continuous for all x...

Homework Statement



Suppose f is a mapping from R to R and that the fourth derivative of f is continuous for every real number. If x is a local maximum of f and f"(x)=0 (the second derivative is zero at x), what must be true of the third derivative at x? Fully justify your answer.

The Attempt at a Solution



my thinking so far is that since the forth derivative is continuous for every real number, it should exists for every real number. If the forth derivative exists, it means that the third derivative is continuous for every real number (since we know that if derivative of f exists at a point x, then f is continuous at that point). so all I know is that the third derivative is continuous at every point including point x.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You should know more than that. You haven't used the fact that you are at a local maximum and that f"= 0 there. The Taylor's series for f(x), about x= a, is f(a)+ f'(a)(x-a)+ f"(a)/2 (x-a)2+ (f'''(a)/6) (x-a)3+ higher order terms. If x= a is a local maximum then its first derivative, f'(a), is 0 and you are told that the second derivative, f"(a) is also 0: f(x)= f(a)+ (f'''(a)/6)(x-a)3+ higher order terms. For x sufficiently near a, we can ignore those "higher order terms" in comparison to f(a) and (f'''(a)/6) (x-a)3. Think about what happens if x is slightly larger than a and what happens if x is slightly larger than a.
 


HallsofIvy said:
You should know more than that. You haven't used the fact that you are at a local maximum and that f"= 0 there. The Taylor's series for f(x), about x= a, is f(a)+ f'(a)(x-a)+ f"(a)/2 (x-a)2+ (f'''(a)/6) (x-a)3+ higher order terms. If x= a is a local maximum then its first derivative, f'(a), is 0 and you are told that the second derivative, f"(a) is also 0: f(x)= f(a)+ (f'''(a)/6)(x-a)3+ higher order terms. For x sufficiently near a, we can ignore those "higher order terms" in comparison to f(a) and (f'''(a)/6) (x-a)3. Think about what happens if x is slightly larger than a and what happens if x is slightly larger than a.



Thank you very much for he help.
So should I consider different cases like:
1. x-->a+ (i.e. x-a>0), then if f(x)>f(a)==>f"'(a)>0
if f(x)<f(a)==>f"'(a)<0

and the same argument for x-->a- (i.e. x-a<0)

but I am confused about this fact that having both first and second derivative equal to zero tells me that when x gets very close to a, then f(x) gets very close or equal to f(a). Knowing this, doesn't mean that f"'(a)=0 using the Taylor expansion of f(x) you have written?

Thanks again,
 


No, it doesn't. It means that f(x)= f(a)+ f'''(a)/6 (x- a)3+ higher power terms. Putting x= a tells you nothing about f'''(a) because the (x-a)3 term is 0.

Now, if x is slightly larger than a, what is the sign of (x-a)3? What if x is slightly smaller than a?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top