Fabricating PIN Diode with Boron, Si and Phosphorus

  • Thread starter Thread starter mabm_05
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diode Pin
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the fabrication of a PIN diode using boron, silicon, and phosphorus, detailing the doping process and the creation of contacts on a silicon wafer. The author has measured the I-V characteristics of the diode but lacks a formula or reference for comparison. They seek assistance in finding the appropriate formula to validate their measurements. The inquiry highlights a need for guidance in analyzing the electrical properties of their fabricated device. Overall, the thread emphasizes the challenges faced in characterizing a newly fabricated PIN diode.
mabm_05
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hii...

I already fabricated PIN diode using boron (P), Si (N-type), and phosphorus (N). For the method, I etching two contact at Si wafer then doping the boron and phosphorus... there are width I-region (Si) between the contact.

A already measured the I-V characteristic of PIN diode but don't have any formula or reference for compare with the measurement. I want know the formula to prove my IV Characteristic PIN diode. help me...??


Picture my fabricated PIN diode :

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_cyXmnum7K...AAASE/wP1YD3xEjJg/s1600/PIN+diode+2+copy.jpg"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
every one can't help me?
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Back
Top