Factor principal ideals in a field with class number 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter R.P.F.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Class Field
R.P.F.
Messages
210
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let K be a number field. Let a be an irreducible element of K. Prove that if <a>(the ideal generated by a) is not a prime ideal, then it is a product of two prime ideals.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I'm actually quite clueless...:frown: I have been thinking maybe it is possible for me to obtain some information about the extension K:Q from the condition that the class number is 2, like the degree of the extension, etc..?
Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The class number of K and the degree of the extension K/Q have nothing to do with each other. (There are quadratic extensions of Q with arbitrarily large class number.)

In your problem I assume by an "irreducible element of K" you really mean an irreducible element in the ring of integers of K. Anyway, just start with what you're given: (a) is not prime, so it factors into a product of prime ideals. Some of these will be principal, some not. Try to use the fact that the class group is Z/2Z to simplify your factorization.
 
Thanks for your reply!
morphism said:
In your problem I assume by an "irreducible element of K" you really mean an irreducible element in the ring of integers of K.
Yes. This is what I meant.
morphism said:
Some of these will be principal, some not.

Could they really be principal? Would that imply that a has a proper factor, which is a contradiction?
 
R.P.F. said:
Could they really be principal? Would that imply that a has a proper factor, which is a contradiction?
Good! Can you use this observation to finish off the solution?
 
Figured it out! Finally can take a break after 8 hours in the library. :approve:

Thanks so much. :biggrin:
 
Well done!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top