Factored moment resistance of a concrete beam

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the factored moment resistance of a concrete beam, specifically addressing confusion over the relevant equations and parameters. The equation mentioned is Mr = fr*As*fy (d - a / 2), where fr is the factor for reinforced steel, typically 0.85. The user is uncertain about the area of steel reinforcement (As), which is stated as 900mm², and seeks clarification on how to derive this value. Additionally, there is confusion regarding the depth (d) and the equivalent rectangular stress block (a), including how to determine the distance to the neutral axis (c). The user requests assistance in understanding these concepts to solve the problem accurately.
steve321
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
28mi5ab.png


hi,

this is a sample question.. I'm having trouble with part a)

google has led me to believe that the equation i need for factored moment resistance is

Mr = fr*As*fy (d - a / 2)

fr is the factor, and i think it's .85 for reinforced steel according to those CSA guides

As is the area of the steel reinforcement. according to the answer, it is 900mm2. no idea where this comes from.

fy is 400

d is the depth from the most compressed part to centroid of the reinforcement (i think), which is 600 - 40 - 11 - 1/2diameter of steel.. again, I'm told the diameter is 20mm but am not sure how to get this from the diagram.

a is the depth of equivalent rectangular stress block, and this is also where i start getting a little confused. why do you need to know this anyway? how does an equivalent material factor into what I'm doing right now? and how do you solve for a?

in the answer, a is replaced with B1 - c, and c is supposedly the distance to the neutral axis (i think).. it gets a little confusing to me at this point.

if anyone can clear up any of these points i'd appreciate it.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top