Factoring a 4th degree polynomial

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around factoring the polynomial equation f''(t) = 0, specifically the term t^4 - 2t^3 - 3. The user initially struggles with finding roots through guess-and-check methods, leading to confusion about the rational root theorem. Clarifications are provided regarding the correct application of the theorem, indicating that potential rational roots must be factors of the constant term and the leading coefficient. The conversation highlights that testing values like -1, 1, -3, and 3 could yield roots, and it is noted that there is at least one positive real root in the polynomial. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of correctly applying algebraic principles to solve polynomial equations.
mbrmbrg
Messages
485
Reaction score
2
I have the equation

f''(t) = 0 =\frac{\ -6t-4t^4+2t^5}{(1+2t)^4}

which I factored to

0 =\frac{ (2t)(-3-2t^3+t^4)}{(1+2t)^4}

and set

2t = 0 or t^4-2t^3-3 = 0

How am I supposed to factor the second possibility for t? Using guess-and-check () with 0, 1, and -1, I found that t is probably a fraction between -1 and 1. And now I'm stuck for real, because no way am I guess-and-checking random fractions.

Help, please!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry, having latex trouble.

My second step should read 0=[(2t)(-3 - 2t^3 +t^4)]/(1+t^2)^4
but I don't think it does, and I can't figure out how to fix the code.
I'm blaming my computer display
 
All rational roots can be found by the rational root theorem, you don't have to check many:

http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/RationalRootTheorem.html

In any case, when you tried to put in t=-1, you should have gotten 0, no? So you can reduce it to a cubic at least.

hmm, 0 =\frac{\ (2t)(-3-2t^3+t^4)}{(1+2t)^4}

odd, it's a cut and paste from yours.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The latex doesn't work because you have an extra \ after \frac{
 
Last edited:
Ouch. Another good reason not to guess-and-check: my algebra tends to be better than my arithmetic. Oh, ouch.

Ummm, I looked at the rational root theorem, but I don't know if I'm using it right.
Does it say I have some root p/q, where my first coefficient (here 1) is divisible by p and my last coefficient (here -3) is divisible by q? So my answer is -1/3??
OK, apparently not, because that doesn't give me zero.

In either case, it looks like any root will require t to be negative, and in this case, t is time...

But now I'm curious how this rational root theorem works.
 
The rational root theorem:

Any rational root of a polynomial will be in the form p/q, where p is a factor of the constant term, and q is a factor of the leading coefficient (so in this case, p is +/-3, 1, and q is +/-1).

So your best bets would be to check 3, -3, 1, and -1
 
0rthodontist said:
The latex doesn't work because you have an extra \ after \frac{

That should just put a space in though? I don't think I changed anything in my cut and paste. Not important though.



mbrmbrg, you have the rational root theorem reversed, if p/q is a root then q divides your lead coefficient, here a 1, and p divides your constant coefficient, here -3. So you must have q=+ or -1 (so any rational root must also be an integer), and p=+/- 1 or 3. So to find all rational roots, just stick -1, 1, -3, and 3 into your equation. These are not guaranteed to be roots, but any rational root *must* be one of these.

You must have a positive real roots though. You polynomial is -3 at t=0 and greater than 0 when t is large and positive, so there's at least one root in there somewhere.
 
OK, got it now--thanks people!
 
Back
Top