Factorising a differntiated equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter bkvitha
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around factorizing a differentiated equation, specifically y=(2x+3)(4x-3)^(1/2), and finding dy/dx in the form kx/(4x-3)^(1/2). The original poster expresses difficulty with factorization and differentiation, leading to confusion about the application of the chain rule. Corrections are provided regarding the derivative dv/dx, clarifying that it should be (1/2)(4x-3)^(-1/2) instead of the previously stated form. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the chain rule and common denominators in simplifying the expression for dy/dx. Ultimately, the poster gains clarity on the problem after further discussion and corrections.
bkvitha
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Hello there,

I'm quite weak in factorising functions,especially those with indices.
I would appreciate any link on these kind of factorisation or even some tutoring on it.

this is a question I'm stuck in.

y=(2x+3)(4x-3)^1/2, show dy/dx can be written in the form kx/(4x-3)^1/2


my solution:

dy/dx =v(du/dx) + u(dv/dx)

where u=2x+3
du/dx=2
v=(4x-3)^1/2
dv/dx= -2(4x-3)^-1/2

then, dy/dx=[(4x-3)^1/2 ]2 -(-2)(2x+3)[(4x-3)^-1/2]
= 2{(4x-3)^1/2 - (2x+3)(4x-3)^-1/2}

= . . . .

(stumped!)
I am not sure what to do after that
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
bkvitha said:
Hello there,

I'm quite weak in factorising functions,especially those with indices.
I would appreciate any link on these kind of factorisation or even some tutoring on it.

this is a question I'm stuck in.

y=(2x+3)(4x-3)^1/2, where its dy/dx can be written in the form kx/(4x-3)^1/2
There is no question there at all! Do you mean you are asked to find dy/dx in that form?

my solution:

dy/dx =v(du/dx) + u(dv/dx)

where u=2x+3
du/dx=2
v=(4x-3)^1/2
dv/dx= -2(4x-3)^-1/2
No, dv/dx= (1/2)(4x-3)^(-1/2)

then, dy/dx=[(4x-3)^1/2 ]2 -(-2)(2x+3)[(4x-3)^-1/2]
= 2{(4x-3)^1/2 - (2x+3)(4x-3)^-1/2}

= . . . .

(stumped!)
I am not sure what to do after that :rolleyes:

First, as I said, dv/dx= (1/2)(4x-3)^(-1/2), not what you have.

Making that correction, dy/dx= 2(4x-3)^(1/2)+ (1/2)(2x+3)(4x-3)^(-1/2).

It might help you to note that (4x-3)^(1/2)= (4x-3)/(4x-3)^(1/2) and, of course, (4x-3)^(-1/2)= 1/(4x-3)^(1/2). In other words, by replacing (4x-3)^(1/2) with 2(4x-3)/2(4x-3)^(1/2) you have "common denominators":

dy/dx= 4(4x-3)/(2(4x-3)^(1/2))+ (2x+3)/(2(4x-3)^(-1/2)
can you finish that?
 
HallsofIvy said:
No, dv/dx= (1/2)(4x-3)^(-1/2)

I do not understand why is it so

does not the chain rule state that dy/dx=dy/du *du/dx

hence, when y= U^n

dy/dx= (nu^n-1) * (du/dx)

so

v = (4x-3)^1/2

then dv/dx=1/2(4x-3)^(1/2 -1 ) *(4)
=2(4x-3)^-1/2

(correction to my previous equation with that was dv/dx =-2(4x-3)^-1/2)

correct me if I am wrong, pls n ty!and the second part...
t might help you to note that (4x-3)^(1/2)= (4x-3)/(4x-3)^(1/2) and, of course, (4x-3)^(-1/2)= 1/(4x-3)^(1/2).

I have never learned that till now that is my Secondory 5 year!(o-levels like)

enlighten me!
 
Oh oh,
i got the last part , now(had to work it out in a piece of paper first...oops)
 
but i still do not get the chain rule.
my textbook says that , by the waY.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top