I Factorising expectation values

dyn
Messages
774
Reaction score
63
Hi.
I came across the following in the solution to a question I was looking , regarding expectation values of momentum in 3-D
< p12p22p32 > = < p12 > < p22 > <p32 >
ie. the expectation value has been factorised. I can't figure out why this is true and also why it doesn't apply to the following. eg. < p12 > ≠ < p1 > < p1 > ?
Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's only true if the different momentum components are uncorrelated, i.e., if the probability distribution factorizes;
$$P(\vec{p})=P_1(p_1) P_2(p_2) P_3(p_3).$$
Then it's very easy to see that the first equation is correct.

Of course, this does not hold for ##\langle p_1^2 \rangle##, because obviously
$$\langle p_1^2 \rangle=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} p_1 p_1^2 P(p_1),$$
while
$$\langle p_1 \rangle^2=\left [\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} p_1 p_1 P(p_1) \right]^2 \neq \langle p_1^2 \rangle.$$
 
Thanks for your reply. The question actually concerned expectation values of the harmonic oscillator using ladder operators and bras and kets
vanhees71 said:
It's only true if the different momentum components are uncorrelated, i.e., if the probability distribution factorizes;
$$P(\vec{p})=P_1(p_1) P_2(p_2) P_3(p_3).$$
Then it's very easy to see that the first equation is correct.
How would I know that the probability distribution factorises and how does this lead to the first equation being correct ?
 
It's always good to explain the example you have in mind in detail, so that we can answer questions precisely.

If you have a 3D harmonic oscillator with the Hamiltonian
$$\hat{H}=\frac{\hat{\vec{p}}^2}{2m} + \frac{m}{2} \sum_{j=1}^3 \omega_j^2 \hat{x}_j^2,$$
obviously the number operators
$$\hat{N}_j=\hat{a}_{j}^{\dagger} \hat{a}_j$$
commute, and you can build an orthonormal basis of common eigenvectors (the Fock basis of three independent harmonic oscillators). Since each of the operators ##\hat{N}_j## only depend on ##\hat{x}_j## and ##\hat{p}_j## these states are obviously factorizing in the above described way, i.e., in the momentum representation you have
$$u_{N_1,N_2,N_3}(\vec{p})=u_{N_1}(p_1) u_{N_2}(p_2) u_{N_3}(p_3).$$
It's also clear that these are are complete set of energy eigenstates with eigenvalues
$$E_{N_1,N_2,N_3}=\sum_{j=1}^3 \frac{\hbar \omega_j}{2} (2N_j+1).$$
 
Thanks. The actual question is " calculate the following ground-state average for a 3-D harmonic oscillator < 0 | p12p22p32 | 0 > .
The answer then states the word " factorisation" and states < p12p22p32 > = <p12> <p22 > <p32> and then each expectation value is calculated in the usual way. I would just like to know how to show this result using Dirac notation
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top