Fake forces on rotating frames of reference.

AI Thread Summary
In a rotating frictionless disk, a rotating observer at the center perceives a ball at the edge as moving in a circular path due to the non-inertial frame. This observer must account for non-Newtonian forces, specifically centrifugal and Coriolis forces, to explain the ball's motion. The ball, while at rest in an inertial frame, experiences a relative velocity in the rotating frame. The math indicates that the observer measures a force directed towards the center of the circular motion. Ultimately, both centrifugal and Coriolis forces act on the ball, resulting in a net inward centripetal force that aligns with its circular trajectory.
House
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have a rotating frictionless disk and there is a rotating observer on the center of it. Furthermore, suppose a very small ball on the disk's edge. Now we clearly know that the ball is not moving but the rotating observer sees the ball following a circular path with an angular velocity ω opposite of the one of his frame of reference. He now has to explain that movement and, since he is in a non-inertial frame, he has to introduce some non Newtonian forces. Accepting that the ball has a relative velocity vr in the non-inertial frame, the question is:
Is there a centifugal force and a Coriolis force acting on the ball? Or does the ball have to "physically" be included on the disk?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Update: The math says that the rotating observer measures a force given by: F = mω×(ω×r) which is towards the center of the circular motion. Is that it?
 
House said:
Now we clearly know that the disk is not moving...
I assume you mean the ball is at rest in the inertial frame of reference.

House said:
Accepting that the ball has a relative velocity vr in the non-inertial frame, the question is: Is there a centifugal force and a Coriolis force acting on the ball?
Yes, both are acting in opposite directions, and their net effect is the inwards centripetal force, that matches the circular movement in the rotating frame.
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top