Falling Cantaloupe - Distance Above Ground

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catchingupquickly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling Ground
AI Thread Summary
A cantaloupe weighing 0.45 kg falls from a height of 5.4 meters and strikes a tree branch at a speed of 6.3 m/s. Using the equation Δh = (v_i^2 - v_f^2) / (2g), the calculated height of the branch is approximately 3.38 meters above the ground. The mass of the cantaloupe is irrelevant to the height calculation. An alternative check suggests the cantaloupe falls about 2 meters in roughly 0.65 seconds, supporting the initial calculation. The conclusion confirms the branch's height as approximately 3.38 meters.
Catchingupquickly
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cantaloupe with a mass of 0.45 kg falls out of a tree house that is 5.4 meters above the ground. It hits a tree branch at a speed of 6.3 m/s. How high is the tree branch from the ground?

Homework Equations


## \Delta h = \frac {v_i^2 - v_f^2} {2g} ##

The Attempt at a Solution


Given:

g = 9.80 ## m/s^2 ##
inital velocity = 0
final velocity = 6.3 m/s
mass = 0.45 kg (but here it's a red herring)

## \Delta h = \frac {0 - (6.3 m/s)^2} {(2) 9.80 m/s^2}
\\= \frac {-39.69} {19.6} ##
= -2.025 meters

So 5.4 meters - 2.025 meters = 3.375 or 3.38 meters above the ground.

Am I correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think so.
 
Catchingupquickly said:

Homework Statement


A cantaloupe with a mass of 0.45 kg falls out of a tree house that is 5.4 meters above the ground. It hits a tree branch at a speed of 6.3 m/s. How high is the tree branch from the ground?

Homework Equations


## \Delta h = \frac {v_i^2 - v_f^2} {2g} ##

The Attempt at a Solution


Given:

g = 9.80 ## m/s^2 ##
inital velocity = 0
final velocity = 6.3 m/s
mass = 0.45 kg (but here it's a red herring)

## \Delta h = \frac {0 - (6.3 m/s)^2} {(2) 9.80 m/s^2}
\\= \frac {-39.69} {19.6} ##
= -2.025 meters

So 5.4 meters - 2.025 meters = 3.375 or 3.38 meters above the ground.

Am I correct?

You could always check by calculating it a different way. For example, here is a quick check:

With gravity at ##9.8 m/s^2## it takes about ##0.65 s## to reach ##6.3 m/s##. If gravity were ##10 m/s^2## it would be ##0.63 s##, so it's a bit more than that.

The average speed when falling from rest is half the final speed, so that's approx ##3.1 m/s##.

##3.1 \times 0.65 \approx 1.95 + 0.06 = 2.01##

So, the object fell about ##2 m##.
 
  • Like
Likes Catchingupquickly
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top