yeahhyeahyeah
- 29
- 0
Not sure if this is in the right subforum but:
A chain of uniform mass density, length b, and mass M hangs in a loop from the ceiling (both its ends are adjacent to each other) At time t = 0, one end, end B is released. Find the tension in the chain at point A after end B has fallen a distance x by a) assuming free fall b) by using energy conservationThis is an example in Marion/Thornton's Classical dynamics of systems and particles.
They start of by stating that the time derivative of the center of mass momentum is equal to the weight minus the tension. I do not fundamentally understand this. Why is the tension not just equal to the instantaneous weight of the side of the chain that is immobile?
In other wods, I tried to use this:
T = (M+\rhodx)g
Sorry, I'm not sure if this is in the right subforum... ?
but the book starts off with
\dot{P} = Mg - TWhat is the physical significance of that equation? I think I understand it sort of... but doesn't this mean that the downwards force could be greater than the tension... and then that the chain would fall off the ceiling? I don't really understand the physical significance of this
A chain of uniform mass density, length b, and mass M hangs in a loop from the ceiling (both its ends are adjacent to each other) At time t = 0, one end, end B is released. Find the tension in the chain at point A after end B has fallen a distance x by a) assuming free fall b) by using energy conservationThis is an example in Marion/Thornton's Classical dynamics of systems and particles.
They start of by stating that the time derivative of the center of mass momentum is equal to the weight minus the tension. I do not fundamentally understand this. Why is the tension not just equal to the instantaneous weight of the side of the chain that is immobile?
In other wods, I tried to use this:
T = (M+\rhodx)g
Sorry, I'm not sure if this is in the right subforum... ?
but the book starts off with
\dot{P} = Mg - TWhat is the physical significance of that equation? I think I understand it sort of... but doesn't this mean that the downwards force could be greater than the tension... and then that the chain would fall off the ceiling? I don't really understand the physical significance of this
Last edited: