Falling mass attached to wheel

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a falling mass attached to a wheel, specifically focusing on the dynamics of the system using torque and angular momentum. Participants are exploring the relationships between the falling mass, the wheel's rotation, and the effects of tension in the cable connecting them.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the use of torque and angular momentum to analyze the motion of a falling mass attached to a rotating wheel. There is a focus on the implications of mass ratios and the role of tension in the system. Some participants question the assumptions made regarding the mass of the cylinder and the effects of tension on the torque calculation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's reasoning. There is recognition of the need to consider both the cylinder and the falling mass as a combined system, and some guidance has been offered regarding the internal nature of tension and its impact on angular momentum calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the assumptions about the mass of the cylinder and the nature of the cable (non-stretching) are critical to the analysis. There is an ongoing exploration of how these factors influence the torque and angular momentum in the system.

axe34
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


upload_2015-5-12_14-25-13.png


Homework Equations


I am aware that this can be done via energy methods. However, I wish to do it via:

integral between t1 and t2 of Torques about point (say centre of the wheel) = change in angular momentum of the wheel.

The Attempt at a Solution


The torque is mgR. t1 is zero.
I get that the block hits the floor at t = (square root of 2gh)/g

When I use the change in angular momentum equation, I get w (omega) final as (2.m. (square root of 2gh))/MR but this supposedly is not correct.

Any ideas??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
axe34 said:
I get that the block hits the floor at t = (square root of 2gh)/g

This cannot be correct. It is only correct when the cylinder is massless. Consider the case where the cylinder is much more massive than the attached mass - the acceleration will be much lower due to the torque needed to accelerate the rotation of the cylinder. Your result must depend on the ratio of masses. It seems to me that you are ignoring how the cylinder and hanging mass are affecting each other through the tension in the string.
 
I've looked into this a bit further - I was neglecting the possible tension in the cable. I thought that a non-stretching cable meant no tension but apparently not!
 
You do not need to compute the tension. If you consider the system including both cylinder and falling mass, the tension is internal and does not affect the angular momentum.
 
Yes, but the torque is not just mgR now, but probably (mg-T)R
 
axe34 said:
I've looked into this a bit further - I was neglecting the possible tension in the cable. I thought that a non-stretching cable meant no tension but apparently not!
Non-stretching cable means that its length does not change.
There is tension in the cable. That tension acts both on the cylinder and the falling mass.
 
axe34 said:
Yes, but the torque is not just mgR now, but probably (mg-T)R

This is because you are now considering the cylinder only as your system. If you consider the cylinder and hanging mass as one system as I suggested, then:
Orodruin said:
If you consider the system including both cylinder and falling mass, the tension is internal and does not affect the angular momentum.
The torque on the full system (including both cylinder and hanging mass) is definitely still mgR. What you have to figure out is what the angular momentum is.
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
15K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
17K