I Famous 'Aspect Experiment' -- Which Type of Polarizers Were Used?

d_bar_x
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Which type of polarizers were used?
Does anyone know exactly which kind of polarizers were used in the famous Aspect experiment from 1982? I've read they were crystal polarizers. Does that mean Calcite, or Nicol, or something else?

[Reference link added by the Mentors:]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect's_experiment
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
With the use of two-channel polarizers, we have performed an experiment following much more closely the ideal scheme of Figure 1. Our polarizers were polarizing cubes with dielectric layers transmitting one polarization and reflecting the orthogonal one.††

††A similar experiment, using calcite two channel polarizers, had been considered at the University of Catania
from https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0402001 it is a bit ambiguous, but I would guess calcite too.

Edit: Note that Nicol prisms are made of calcite too, but in Aspect's habilitation, he refers to Wollaston's prisms (unfortunately only in theoretical framework and not the experimental one). In diagrams of the experiments the polarizers look very cubical, definitely not Nicol.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes DrChinese and berkeman
Thanks. I'll try to contact one of those researchers to find out which polarizers.
d_bar_x
 
d_bar_x said:
Thanks. I'll try to contact one of those researchers to find out which polarizers.
d_bar_x
In the thesis (unfortunately in French) there are several details of the polarizers and optical commutators, however no mention of the material.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top