Faraday's law. Induced electric field.

AI Thread Summary
Faraday's law allows for the calculation of the induced electric field from changing magnetic flux by integrating over a defined loop, which does not need to be confined to a physical wire. The electric field can exist in free space, but using a current-conducting wire simplifies the calculations due to the homogeneity of the electric field within it. There is often confusion in literature regarding the integral form of Faraday's law, as it is frequently presented incompletely or in special cases. The fundamental laws of electromagnetism, encapsulated in Maxwell's equations, apply universally across inertial frames. Understanding the general case of Faraday's law, including moving surfaces and boundaries, clarifies the relationship between electric fields and magnetic fields in electromotive force calculations.
disknoir
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
When you use Faraday's law to calculate the induced electric field due to a changing magnetic flux, you integrate over a loop defined by the circuit you're interested in.

Why is the electric field confined to the circuit? Couldn't I just pick a random loop in space and integrate over that?

Why can't free space support the magnetic field?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What I meant to say was, why can't free space support the electric field?
 
The answer is that you can use any loop in Faraday's Law. There's no need for a wire or something. Often, however it's convenient to choose the path through a current conducting wire since, if it's thin enough, the electric field is homogeneous inside it in very good approximation.

One should keep in mind that there is a lot of confusion concerning Faraday's Law in the literature, because often they present the integral form of this law first, and usually they present it incompletely or for special cases. The basic laws of electromagnetism, valid in any inertial frame of reference are Maxwell's equations in differential form. Faraday's law reads
\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E}=-\frac{1}{c} \partial_t \vec{B}=0.
This holds true in any case. It's a fundamental law of physics!

Now you can integrate the whole equation over an arbitrary area and use Stokes's integral theorem to get:
\int_{\partial A} \mathrm{d} \vec{x} \cdot \vec{E}=-\frac{1}{c} \int_{A} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{F} \cdot \vec{B}.
Here, you can choose any area with any boundary you like. It doesn't need to be a wire or anything else physical. It can be just abstract mathematical areas and boundary lines.

The confusion now comes from the fact that usually one tries to write the time derivative outside of the surface integral and then makes more or less explicitly assumptions, which are not always valid. It's way easier to first look at the most general case of a moving surface with moving boundary. You can prove that in this most general case the Faraday law takes the integral form
\int_{\partial A} \mathrm{d} \vec{x} \cdot \left (\vec{E} + \frac{\vec{v}}{c} \times \vec{b} \right )=-\frac{1}{c} \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} \int_{A} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{F} \cdot \vec{B}.
Here \vec{v}=\vec{v}(t,\vec{x}) is the velocity of each point at the surface-boundary line. The left-hand side thus gives you the complete electromotive force, including the one due to the magnetic field.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top