Fatal Pressure in Car Crashes with Airbags & Seatbelts

AI Thread Summary
Airbags significantly reduce the risk of injury in car crashes by cushioning the impact and decreasing the deceleration force on occupants. The discussion highlights the importance of energy absorption over pressure, noting that high pressure for a short duration may cause less damage than moderate pressure over a longer time. Contact area estimates for airbags and seatbelts were debated, with adjustments made to reflect more realistic values. The conversation emphasizes the need to compare the effectiveness of airbags versus seatbelts in preventing injuries, particularly focusing on how airbags minimize deceleration forces. Overall, understanding the mechanics of impact and energy transfer is crucial for analyzing injury prevention in collisions.
Frank_Horrigan
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello, for a part of my grade 11 physics paper I have to describe how air bags are useful in car crashes. So far what I've done is a sample crash, calculating how much force is on the driver, then i calculated the pressure that would be on the driver. I was wondering how much pressure would be fatal in a car accident, if anyone could point me to a site or something which explains this I would be grateful.

Another question, what would be reasonable area to use for car crashes

With aibag and seatbelt hitting the chest (I said .5m^2)
With onyl seatbelt hitting the chest (I said .025 m^2 (thinking seatbelt covers 5 cm x50 cm of your body))
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not an expert here, but I'll set the ball rolling...

I suspect that the amount of energy (rather than pressure) absorbed by the various parts of the occupants of the car is of more use in determining the extent of injury that the occupants suffer. Being subjected to a very high pressure for a very short time can cause less damage to a person than being subjected to a moderate pressure for a longer time, and your investigation should account for this. However, you seem to be getting there...

As for your contact areas, I think that your seat-belt only value is close enough (perhaps a little bit high, especially if you consider non-uniform loading). Your seat-belt and airbag value seems very high though, what type of airbag is this?
 
After thinking about what you said about the air bag I decided to change my size down to .3m^2 which to me seems more reasonable. I don't know what to do about the pressure injury aspect of this problem though, the exact problem says explain how airbags minimize injury during a head on collision using physics diagrams and examples. I'm not sure if this means to explain how much damage was actually done, or if it means to just compare airbags to seatbelts. After thinking the pressure thing through more it seems that the question doesn't really work because I would think that pressure done to your face would result in more damage then the chest area. So there is no numerical value to the amount of pressure probably.


I guess I will just comapre the two and come up with a diagram for it.
 
Any numerical value of pressure would indeed change rapidly with time over the course of a collision, and (as you say) have different implications for different body parts. If you want to think about numbers, I think that energy transferred to the victim would be a more useful parameter, but I'd like someone else's opinion on this.

For now, I would probably concentrate on looking at the reasons why airbags can help to prevent injury, as compared with seatbelts. You should be thinking about what the effect of cushioning actually is, - reducing the magnitude of deceleration of the victim's head. You could easily have diagrams (and even sketched graphs, with a little imagination) here.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top