FBD of Flexible and Rigid Body Coupling

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a problem with the signs in the force balance of a flexible and rigid body coupling system. The user derived the constraint force Q(t) as Q(t) = k[u(L,t) - y] + c[(du/dt) - (dy/dt)], but noted discrepancies with the professor's answer regarding sign changes. The feedback indicates that the sign error arises from the direction indicated in the free body diagram (FBD), where positive Q is shown to the left. This clarification helped the user understand the source of their mistake. Properly aligning the signs in the FBD with the derived equations is crucial for accurate force balance analysis.
ThLiOp
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Problem:

I am having a bit of problem with the signs on the force balance with the constraining force. The system is:

1.jpg
Attempt:

I drew the FBD with the constraining force for the lumped mass:

2.jpg

Then I tried to solve for the constraint force in terms of the spring and damper:

3.jpg


For the constraint force, Q(t), I end up getting:

Q(t) = k[u(L,t) - y] + c[(du/dt) - (dy/dt)]

The answer that the professor gives has the signs changed on the k and c terms. Where am I going wrong?

Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    20.1 KB · Views: 552
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    11.6 KB · Views: 474
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    19.2 KB · Views: 504
Physics news on Phys.org
The expression you wrote for Q(t) is positive when u(L,t)>y And the same for derivatives. Now look at your FBD; it shows positive Q to the let. There is your sign error.
 
  • Like
Likes ThLiOp
Thank you Dr.D, that makes sense now!
 
Back
Top