- #1
fdarkangel
- 24
- 0
chroot said:fdarkangel,
You are incorrect. It is perfectly acceptable to call chemical potential, gravitational potential, sound, heat, etc. "types" of energy.
you sound too confident.
i guess, in order to categorize "things" into types, there must be a real difference (i hope you're not too pedantic and understand what i mean with "difference": an inequality between terms).
please go ahead and explain how your list of energy types are inequal; enlighten me.
edit: and if possible, could you add definitions.
Last edited: