Feasibility of a Warm Refrigerator

  • Thread starter Thread starter rghusted
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Refrigerator
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of a "warm refrigerator" that preserves food by removing oxygen instead of lowering temperature. While the idea aims to prevent bacterial growth, it raises concerns about anaerobic bacteria, which thrive in oxygen-free environments and can produce harmful toxins like botulism. Participants highlight that canning is an existing method that effectively preserves food by sterilizing both the food and containers to eliminate bacteria. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding bacterial behavior in different environments. Ultimately, the concept of a warm refrigerator is challenged by the risks associated with anaerobic bacteria.
rghusted
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Feasibility of a "Warm Refrigerator"

I'm looking for some critical feedback on the feasibility of this concept.

As far as I'm aware, the purpose of a refrigerator is to extend the shelf life of perishable food products by lowering the environmental temperature of the food, thus slowing the growth of bacteria. Correct?

Wouldn't a more effective and efficient mechanism to preserve food be to remove oxygen from the environment thus preventing bacterial growth altogether? This could be done with a simple flame to consume the available oxygen within the sealed environment... hence a "warm refrigerator."

Of course you could still lower the temperature - I prefer my beers cold :-)

Thoughts? Comments? Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Then you would have to worry about anaerobic bacteria growth. These bacteria thrive in oxygenless enviroments and are actually poisioned by oxygen. One of these is the one that produces the Botulism poision as a by-product.

Besides, we already have such a "warm" food preservation method. It is called "canning". In canning, however, you have to make sure that food and canning container are both sterilized by heating in order to destroy all bacteria first( to prevent the growth of the the afore mentioned anaerobic bacteria.)
 
Right you are! I guess that's why you're the mentor. And, anaerobic appears to be more toxic to humans than aerobic bacteria. Had I remembered more from my high school biology class, I would have already known the answer. Thanks for the insight.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
9K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Back
Top