Fermi dirac distribution at T->0

ch3m
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Studying the free electron model I found the fermi dirac distribution and the book told me that when T->0 we have that the fermi energy is equal to the chemical potential... why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Er... are you sure you read it right? For metals (free electrons), at T=0, the Fermi energy is equal to the chemical potential, not at T>0.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Er... are you sure you read it right? For metals (free electrons), at T=0, the Fermi energy is equal to the chemical potential, not at T>0.

Zz.

with the arrow i mean the limit T=0
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top