Fermi Energy Calculations About Non Parabolic Dispersions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating Fermi energy and momentum in non-parabolic dispersions, specifically in 2D systems with a dispersion relation of E = A*k^2 + B*k^3. The integration of state density and Fermi-Dirac distribution is deemed unnecessary for isotropic systems, where the Fermi surface can be defined geometrically. For 3D systems, the Fermi surface is a sphere, while for 2D systems, it is a cylinder, allowing for straightforward calculations of Fermi momentum and energy using the volume of occupied states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermi-Dirac statistics
  • Familiarity with dispersion relations in solid-state physics
  • Knowledge of Brillouin zones and crystal lattices
  • Basic calculus for integration and geometric volume calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the geometric properties of Fermi surfaces in isotropic systems
  • Learn about the implications of non-quadratic dispersion relations
  • Explore the numerical methods for Fermi surface calculations in complex materials
  • Read "Solid State Physics" by Ashcroft and Mermin for detailed examples
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and students studying solid-state physics, particularly those interested in Fermi energy calculations and non-parabolic dispersion relations.

MartinCort
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Greetings!
It is easy to understand that for a free electron, we can easily define the energy state density, and by doing the integration of the State density* Fermi-Dirac distribution we will be able to figure out the chemical potential at zero kelvin, which is the Fermi-Energy. Hence, we can define the Fermi Momentum correspondingly.

However, I feel rather struggling to define the fermi-momentum and Fermi energy for a non-parabolic dispersion.

Say, For example, A 2D system, I have a dispersion
E = A*k^2 +B*k^3

So k(E) will be in general complicated due to its cubic relations.

So If we still want to evaluate the Fermi Energy, Do still solve the integration
int _0 ^E_f state density*Fermi-Dirac Distribution dE = Number of Particles
to evaluate E_f?

And I think this integration will be very complicated.

Also, Under this circumstance, how do we define the Ferim-Momentum? Do we still solve
E_f = A k_F^2 + B k_F^3 to find k_F?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Non-quadratic dispersion is not a big deal as long as the system is isotropic. You don't need to integrate anything!
All you need is a volume of the occupied state. For 3D case, the Fermi surface is a sphere whose volume is equal to ## V_F = \frac 4 3 \pi k^3_F##. If you have one electron per primitive unit cell, the Fermi sphere volume is 1/2 the volume of the first Brillouin zone. That gives you the Fermi momentum using elementary math. Then the Fermi energy can be easily obtained by inserting the Fermi momentum value into the dispersion formula. For the 2-D case, the Fermi surface is a cylinder. Project that onto a plane and use planar geometry formulae.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MartinCort
Henryk said:
Non-quadratic dispersion is not a big deal as long as the system is isotropic. You don't need to integrate anything!
All you need is a volume of the occupied state. For 3D case, the Fermi surface is a sphere whose volume is equal to ## V_F = \frac 4 3 \pi k^3_F##. If you have one electron per primitive unit cell, the Fermi sphere volume is 1/2 the volume of the first Brillouin zone. That gives you the Fermi momentum using elementary math. Then the Fermi energy can be easily obtained by inserting the Fermi momentum value into the dispersion formula. For the 2-D case, the Fermi surface is a cylinder. Project that onto a plane and use planar geometry formulae.

Thanks for your reply!

I think I somehow understand the idea of this. Would you like to recommend some literature on these materials?
 
I don't know anything specific about non-quadratic dispersion. But this should be intuitive. You fill up the band with all available electrons and as long as the dispersion is isotropic, the shape of the Fermi surface is spherical. From Born-van Karman boundary conditions, you will get that number of allowed states in each band is equal to 2 x number of Bravais cells in the crystal (2 because of spin degeneracy). This point is easy to see in the case of a cubic lattice.
If the bands are not symmetric, then the situation gets a bit more complicated. In simpler case, they could be ellipsoidal. These could happen in semi-metals when the bands are much less than 1/2 full. In general, the shape can be quite complex. See for example Ashcroft and Mermin for some examples. I did Fermi surface calculations for intercalated graphite and had to do numerical calculations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K