Feynman diagrams for more than two particles

radoo
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Are the Feynman diagrams still applicable to more than two particles interactions? This would be very helpful in modelling many-body scattering cross-sections.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Feynman diagrams can handle any type of interaction you like, you simply have a different kind of vertex. However, very high point interactions are often irrelevant in the renormalization group sense and so contribute little to low energy scattering processes.

What sort of many-body scattering did you have in mind?
 
What dou you mean by many-body scattering?

Are there m ingoing and n outgoing particles of a general "interaction blob"? Or are there really m+n particles meeting at one vertex?

The former one is simply a higher-oder process which is typically highly supressed by renormalization group and phase space. The latter one is rarely realized in physical models. You can get something like that in f(R) gravity theories (which some people find rather strange as a QFT) or in non-linear sigma models or effective modelsfor the string interaction, which are to be considered as approximations only
 
I was thinking that the photoelectric effect cross section could be computed using Feynman diagrams...
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top