Feynmann diagram - positron representation

prajor
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hello, this might be a basic question. In feynman diagram's we represent the positron as traveling backwards in time. Is that correct ? How do we interpret this ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
prajor, Nothing travels backward in time, including positrons. Quantum field theory is carefully designed to preserve causality, which means that signals cannot propagate faster than light or into the past. The interpretation of antiparticles has been modified several times as we came to understand them better.

Originally it was thought that relativistic quantum mechanics would be described by a wavefunction φ(x, t) analogous to the Schrodinger wavefunction. As usual, what you do is Fourier transform φ and speak of plane waves, φ ~ exp(i(k·x - ωt)) But among these now are solutions with ω < 0. However they do not violate causality. On the contrary, including them is necessary to preserve causality.

Since the usual quantum interpretation is p = hk, E = hω, the first thought was that these states represented negative energy solutions. But the difficulty with this was quickly realized: any interaction would cause positive energy solutions to decay into negative energy ones, and consequently normal states including the vacuum state would be unstable.

So Dirac proposed his 'hole theory', in which the negative energy levels are fully occupied. The Pauli principle would prevent the transition of any more particles to those levels. In this theory the positron was seen as an unoccupied negative energy level. But hole theory is wrong. In the first place it only works for fermions. In the second place the fully occupied sea would result in the vacuum having infinite energy and infinite charge, with real physical consequences which are not observed.

Feynman's idea of positrons moving backwards in time was next, and while this, along with his diagram expansion, made his calculations much easier, it is wrong also.

Here's what we now understand. Relativistic quantum theory is not described by a wavefunction analogous to the Schrodinger wavefunction. The quantity φ(x, t) is an operator. Its negative frequency components do not represent negative energy particles, nor do they represent particles traveling backwards in time. There simply are no negative energy states. The Hilbert space does not contain them. What it contains instead are positive energy states for the antiparticles. The positive frequency terms in φ are particle creation operators, and the mysterious negative frequency terms are antiparticle annihilation operators. Feynman's idea was right in that the amplitudes for electron emission and positron absorption are related. But in such a case the positron does not travel to the past, it comes from it.
 
Bill, thanks a lot for the elaborate answer. That really helps.

BTW, may I know if there is a comprehensive source (book / site) covering other areas, leading to the current understanding as you explained ?
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top