Does the shape of a conductor affect the induced magnetic field?

AI Thread Summary
When a conductor moves through a steady-state magnetic field, the induced magnetic field is not simply proportional to the external field, as it depends on the field's configuration and the conductor's velocity. The relationship between the induced field and the external magnetic field is more complex than a direct proportionality expressed by a constant matrix. The induced field at any point within the conductor is influenced by the magnetic field at all other points and the conductor's motion. This indicates that the initial assumption of a linear relationship may only serve as a first-order approximation. For a deeper understanding, further references or texts on electromagnetic induction and field theory are recommended.
vibe3
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
If an arbitrary shaped conductor is moving through a steady-state magnetic field, \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r}), is it true that the field induced in the conductor will be proportional to \mathbf{B}? IE:

<br /> \mathbf{B}_{induced}(\mathbf{r}) = M \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r})<br />

where M is a 3-by-3 constant matrix? Or is this simply a first-order approximation to the induced field? Does anyone know of any texts or references which treat this problem? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you consider an induced magnetic field, I guess your conductor is a closed loop (or at least has some circular current paths)?

You cannot evaluate the field point by point. The induced field at one point will depend on the magnetic field everywhere else (and the velocity of the conductor everywhere).
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top