Field strength giving rise to a polarization charge of -s.cos(theta) on a cavity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a problem from electromagnetic theory regarding the polarization charge on a spherical cavity and its effect on electric field strength. Julia is attempting to prove that the field strength at the center of the cavity is s/3e0 but is confused about the potential expansion and boundary conditions. She correctly identifies that the potential inside the cavity must not lead to singularities, which affects her coefficients in the potential expansion. The responses suggest she may be misapplying boundary conditions and that the potential outside the cavity must also be considered to ensure consistency. Ultimately, Julia needs to reassess her approach to the potential functions and their relationship to the boundary conditions to resolve her confusion.
xn_
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I'm learning EM from Bleaney & Bleaney and got stuck on Ex2.1 (can do Ex2.2-2.7, though...) - If the polarization charge on the surface of a spherical cavity is -s.cos(theta), prove that the field strength at the centre is s/3e0. If I expand V(r) within the cavity as A.r.cos(theta) + B.r^-2.cos(theta), then I agree B=0 or else V(0) would be singular, but that leaves the A term and surface charge = e0Er = -e0(dV/dr) = -e0A.cos(theta) and hence A = s/e0 not s/3e0 - what am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Julia
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your boundary condition. Is that statement really true when the potential outside the boundary is not constant in 'r'?:wink:
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Check your boundary condition. Is that statement really true when the potential outside the boundary is not constant in 'r'?:wink:

I've been thinking that the potential outside the cavity (radius R) could be written Vout(r) = B_1.r.cos(theta)+B_2.r^-2.cos(theta), then, and the boundary conditions are that Vout(R)=Vin(R) which implies:
A = B_1 + B_2 R^-2
and that e0E_in,radial(R) = eE_out,radial(R) (where e is the permittivity of the medium surrounding the cavity) which implies:
-e0.A = -e(B_1 - 2B_2.R^-3)
But your reply (thanks!) suggests that I'm doing something fundamentally wrong here - am I wrong to take Vin = A.r.cos(theta) because the Vout depends on r? I see that something of the form B.r would help, but I thought each power of r had do go with a certain power of cos(theta) to make a valid spherical harmonic?
Thanks, Julia
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top