Polarization Charge on the surface of a spherical cavity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the electric field strength at the center of a spherical capacitor with a polarization charge distribution given by -σe cos(θ). The original poster seeks to prove that the field strength at the center is σe/(3ε0).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various approaches, including potential expansions and surface integrals. Some express uncertainty about the correct method to apply, while others suggest using spherical harmonic expansion or direct integration of the electric field contributions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods to tackle the problem. Some guidance has been provided regarding the area element for the surface integral, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach to take or the limits for integration.

Contextual Notes

Participants question the assumptions regarding the area element and the integration limits, indicating a need for clarification on these points. There is also mention of Gauss' Law in relation to the problem.

XCBRA
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The polarizatiob charge on the surface of a spherical capacitor is -\sigma_e \cos(\theta), at a point whose radius vector from the centre makes an angle \theta witha given axis Oz. Prove that the field strength at the centre is \frac{\sigma_e}{3 \epsilon_0},

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Well I not entirly sure how to approach this problem. I tried exapanding the potentials inside and outside the sphere as:
V_{in} = A_1 r \cos(\theta) + \frac{A_2}{r^2}\cos(\theta)<br /> V_{out} = B_1 r \cos(\theta) + \frac{B_2}{r^2}\cos(\theta)

Then since V_{in} \neq \infty, A_2 = 0 ,

then saying that at r=R: D^{perpendicular}_{in} - D^{perpendicular}_{out} = \sigma_f and assuming that both inside and outside have the same permitivitty then E^{radial}_{in} - E^{radial}_{out} = \frac{\sigma_f}{\epsilon_0}.A_1 + B_1 - \frac{B_1}{R^2} = \frac{\sigma_e}{\epsilon_0}

I am not entirely sure if I am aproaching this problem in the right way. Any help or advice on how to g o about solving this problem or problems like this would very much apreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
XCBRA said:

Homework Statement


The polarizatiob charge on the surface of a spherical capacitor is -\sigma_e \cos(\theta), at a point whose radius vector from the centre makes an angle \theta witha given axis Oz. Prove that the field strength at the centre is \frac{\sigma_e}{3 \epsilon_0},

While I am sure there is some clever way to apply spherical harmonic expansion here, the problem is more straight forwardly done by just use integration. Just do a surface integral over the electric field contribution of each area element. There is clear azimuthal rotation symmetry so that you only needs to compute the z component. E_z = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \int \frac{\sigma(\theta) \cos\theta \, da}{R^2} \,, where R is radius of the sphere.
 
Fistly thank yo for your help. Secondly I am having trouble seeing how yuo get to this integral and then how you solve it. Am I correct in saying this is a result of Gauss' Law?

I have tried to compute the integral and i am unfortunately at a loss as to how to do this to get the desired answer:

E_z = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \int \frac{\sigma(\theta) \cos\theta \, da}{R^2}

= \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \int\int \frac{\sigma(\theta) \cos\theta \, rdrd\theta}{R^2}

= \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \int r dr \int \frac{\sigma(\theta) \cos\theta \, d\theta}{R^2}

here is where i am stuck. Do I take limits, and if so how do I determine them, I have tried taking r=R to r=0 and \theta = 0, 2\pi.? Thank you for you help.
 
You have the wrong area element of a sphere. It should be: da = R^2 \sin \theta d\theta d\varphi.

There is no variation in radial distance, so no dr.
 
Last edited:
Ah ok that makes a lot more sense, thank you for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K