MHB Fields and Field Extensions - Dummit and Foote, Ch. 13 .... ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Fields
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Dummit and Foote, Chapter 13 - Field Theory.

I am currently studying Theorem 3 [pages 512 - 513]

I need some help with an aspect the proof of Theorem 3 ... ...

Theorem 3 on pages 512-513 reads as follows:
View attachment 6580
View attachment 6581
In the above text from Dummit and Foote, we read the following:

" ... ... We identify $$F$$ with its isomorphic image in $$K$$ and view $$F$$ as a subfield of $$K$$. If $$\overline{x} = \pi (x)$$ denotes the image of $$x$$ in the quotient $$K$$, then

$$p( \overline{x} ) = \overline{ p(x) }$$ ... ... (since $$\pi$$ is a homomorphism)

... ... "My question is as follows: ... where in the proof of $$p( \overline{x} ) = \overline{ p(x) }$$ does it depend on $$\pi$$ being a homomorphism ...

... indeed, how does one formally and rigorously demonstrate that $$p( \overline{x} ) = \overline{ p(x) }$$ ... ... and how does this proof depend on $$\pi$$ being a homomorphism ...
To make my question clearer consider the case of $$p(x) = x^2 - 5$$ ... ...

Then ...

$$p( \overline{x} ) = \overline{x}^2 - 5_K $$

$$= ( x + ( p(x) ) ( x + ( p(x) ) - ( 5 + ( p(x) )$$

$$= ( x^2 + ( p(x) ) - ( 5 + ( p(x) )$$

$$= ( x^2 - 5 ) + ( p(x) ) = 0$$

$$= \overline{ p(x) } $$
... ... in the above case, my question is ... where does the above calculation depend on $$\pi$$ being a homomorphism ... ?
Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
... indeed, how does one formally and rigorously demonstrate that $$p( \overline{x} ) = \overline{ p(x) }$$ ... ... and how does this proof depend on $$\pi$$ being a homomorphism ...

The homomorphism property of $\pi$ allows for multiplication of cosets, as in your example with $p(x) = x^2 - 5$. In this general case, since $\pi$ is a homomorphism of rings, $\pi(ax^k) = \pi(a)\pi(x)^k=a\pi(x)^k$ for all scalars $a$ and for all $k \ge 0$, i.e., $\overline{ax^k} = a\bar{x}^k$ for all $a$ and $k$. Hence, by additivity of $\pi$, $p(\bar{x}) = \overline{p(x)}$.
 
Euge said:
The homomorphism property of $\pi$ allows for multiplication of cosets, as in your example with $p(x) = x^2 - 5$. In this general case, since $\pi$ is a homomorphism of rings, $\pi(ax^k) = \pi(a)\pi(x)^k=a\pi(x)^k$ for all scalars $a$ and for all $k \ge 0$, i.e., $\overline{ax^k} = a\bar{x}^k$ for all $a$ and $k$. Hence, by additivity of $\pi$, $p(\bar{x}) = \overline{p(x)}$.
Thanks Euge ... most helpful as usual ...

Peter
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K