Figuring out changes in Intensity (Inverse Square Law)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating sound intensity changes using the inverse square law. When measuring sound intensity at a distance R, the intensity at distance 3R is expected to be 9 times less, leading to a decibel difference. The correct formula for decibels is 10 log(R2/R1), but it must account for the inverse square relationship. Participants emphasize the need to square the distances in the intensity ratio and ensure the inverse property is applied correctly. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate calculations in sound intensity measurements.
RichardGib
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If I measure a sound intensity of 1.0 at distance R from its source, what intensity would I measure at distance 3R in a free, unbounded space? What is the difference in decibels?

Homework Equations



I know that the equation for this is 10 (log R2/R1)

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought that the answer could be a 9.54 dB difference. I did: 10(log(9) to figure this out but the answer doesn't seem correct. Any help with answering this question would be greatly appreciated. Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Intensity follows an inverse square law with distance. So you'd expect the intensity at 3R to be 9 times less than the intensity at R, right? So the inverse square law for intensity vs distance looks like:
$$\frac{I_2}{I_1} = \frac{R_1^2}{R_2^2}$$
Decibels are a comparison of intensities, so if you want to use the distances in the decibel formula rather than the intensities you need to remember to keep the inverse square law in mind and employ the squares of the distances and the "inverse" property as well. That said, take a look at the ratio above and then your Relevant equation. Does your equation preserve the "inverse" and "square" properties?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top