Figuring Out Total Kinetic Energy of Rotating Object

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcia888
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the total kinetic energy of a rotating object, combining translational and rotational components. The original formula is K translational + K rotational, represented as (1/2)mv^2 + (1/2)I(v/r)^2. The alternate formula presented is (1/2)mv^2(1 + I/mr^2), which is derived by factoring and substituting the moment of inertia. The key step involves recognizing that I can be expressed in terms of m and r, allowing for simplification to show how both formulas are equivalent. Understanding this derivation is essential for accurately calculating kinetic energy in rotational dynamics.
marcia888
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This isn't a homework question, but I'm just wondering how the text in the book gets from one formula to the next.

To figure out total kinetic energy of a rotating object:

K translational + K rotational

\frac{1}{2}mv^2+\frac{1}{2}I (\frac{v}{r})^2

Then the book gives an alternate formula:

\frac{1}{2}mv^2(1+\frac{I}{mr^2})

So I wanted to see how they get from one to the other. So I tried

\frac{1}{2}mv^2+\frac{1}{2}I (\frac{v}{r})^2

factor out the 1/2v^2

\frac{1}{2}v^2 (m+\frac{I}{r^2})

almost there. But how do I get a 1 in place of the m? I could divide by m, but then I get

\frac{v^2}{2m} (1+\frac{I}{mr^2})

It works for the right term, but not the left. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You just didn't factor out completely.

You ended up with,

\frac{1}{2}v^2 (m+\frac{I}{r^2})

now take out m. i.e. divide both terms inside the brackets by m so that you end up with m outside the barckets.

Alternatively, you could multiply out the alternate formula, and you will end up with the original one.
 


The alternate formula for calculating total kinetic energy of a rotating object is derived from the original formula by substituting the moment of inertia (I) for the rotational kinetic energy term (\frac{1}{2}I (\frac{v}{r})^2). This can be seen by rearranging the original formula as follows:

K translational + K rotational = \frac{1}{2}mv^2+\frac{1}{2}I (\frac{v}{r})^2

= \frac{1}{2}mv^2+\frac{1}{2}(\frac{I}{r^2})v^2

= (\frac{1}{2}m+\frac{1}{2}(\frac{I}{r^2}))v^2

= (\frac{1}{2}m+\frac{I}{2r^2})v^2

Since the moment of inertia (I) is equal to mr^2 for a point mass rotating around a fixed axis, we can substitute this in the formula:

= (\frac{1}{2}m+\frac{mr^2}{2r^2})v^2

= (\frac{1}{2}m+ \frac{m}{2})v^2

= (\frac{m}{2}+\frac{m}{2})v^2

= mv^2

Thus, the alternate formula can be written as:

K total = \frac{1}{2}mv^2(1+\frac{I}{mr^2})

which simplifies to:

K total = \frac{1}{2}mv^2(\frac{m+mr^2}{m})

= \frac{1}{2}mv^2(1+\frac{I}{mr^2})

This alternate formula is useful when calculating the total kinetic energy of a rotating object, as it takes into account both the translational and rotational kinetic energies.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top