Filter specifications, conversion between them

  • Thread starter Thread starter cubeleg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Filter
AI Thread Summary
Filters are characterized by their number of poles and dB/octave specifications, with the transfer function for a low pass filter defined by H(f)=1/√(1+(f/f_C)²P), where P represents the number of poles. A rule of thumb indicates that for each pole, the gain decreases by 6 dB per octave; thus, one pole results in a 6 dB/octave roll-off, while two poles yield a 12 dB/octave roll-off. This pattern continues, with each additional pole contributing an additional 6 dB/octave reduction in amplitude. The discussion also touches on the relationship between the radius of the pole and the magnitude response, suggesting further exploration of this concept. Understanding these relationships is crucial for effective filter design and analysis.
cubeleg
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
In filters usually you can find two different specifications: number of poles and dB/octave.
I know that the poles gives you the transfer functions using this equation for a low pass filter
H(f)=1/\sqrt{1+(f/f_{C})^{2P}}
Where P is the number of poles of the filter. But how can I translate this into the dB/octave. I suppose that there is a rule of thumb but I cannot find it. Can anybody indicate to me this rule or give a reference where I could find it?
Thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
You can derive it or reason it out. For a single pole lowpass filter, calculate the gain at some frequency that is a couple octaves above the cutoff freq. Then double the frequency -- what does the gain do? The gain is _____ with frequency when you're above the cutoff frequency...
 
Ok, thanks for the answer. I have done like that and seems that 6 correspond with 1 pole, 12 with 2 poles, beyond that I haven't obtained any correlations.
 
cubeleg said:
Ok, thanks for the answer. I have done like that and seems that 6 correspond with 1 pole, 12 with 2 poles, beyond that I haven't obtained any correlations.

Correct. For one LPF pole, every time you double the frequency, you get half the amplitude. For two poles, you get one quarter the amplitude, etc.
 
Interesting, berk, i guess this is invoking another question, is the radius of pole shows some similar relation with the magnitude response?
 
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top