Final angular velocity of a mass on a pulley

AI Thread Summary
To determine the final angular velocity of a spool in a pulley system, Newton's 2nd Law and torque equations are applied. The sum of torques is calculated using the radius and force from the weight of the mass, leading to an angular acceleration of 20 rad/s². However, the calculated final angular velocity does not match the energy conservation approach, indicating a potential error in the tension analysis. It is crucial to consider the forces acting on both the bucket and the spool to accurately determine the tension in the string. Properly analyzing these forces will lead to the correct final angular velocity.
austindubose
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use Newton's 2nd Law, sum of torques, and kinematic equations to determine the angular speed of the spool shown in the figure below. Assume the string has a negligible mass, and it turns without slipping. Use g=10 m/s2 for acceleration due to gravity.
1dzor5.png



Homework Equations


Ʃτ=rxF=Iα
F=mA
ωf2i2+2αΔθ

The Attempt at a Solution


Sum of torques:
Ʃτ=rxf
=(.6m)(3kg*10m/s2)(sin 90°)=Iα
--> 18 kgm2/s2=Iα
α=18/[.5(5)(.62)]
α=20 rad/s2

But plugging this into the kinematic equation to solve for ωf doesn't give me the right answer (I know this because I calculated ωf based on conservation of energy first (ωf=11.01 rad/sec), so I think I may have messed up somewhere up until this point. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do not assume that the force exerted on the spool equals the weight of the bucket. You need to figure out the tension in the string. (Analyze forces on the bucket as well as on the spool.)
 
Thank you! I knew it was something having to do with the tension. And I wasn't thinking of doing forces on both objects, more of just doing it as a whole.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top