Final velocity of a ball down a ramp.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the final velocity of a ball rolling down a ramp, specifically questioning whether the acceleration remains constant at 9.8 m/s² regardless of the ramp's shape, assuming no friction is present.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between gravitational acceleration and the ramp's shape, questioning if the acceleration is always 9.8 m/s². They discuss the application of energy conservation equations and kinematic equations to find final velocity, while also considering the effects of forces such as normal force.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants raising questions about the implications of using different equations for velocity. Some have suggested that while the final velocity may be the same, the acceleration could differ due to the ramp's geometry and the nature of motion (e.g., rolling versus sliding).

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the effects of friction and the nature of the ball's motion (rolling versus sliding) on the acceleration and final velocity, indicating a need for clarity on these assumptions.

HHH
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If a ball is dropped down a ramp of any shape, will the acceleration always be 9.8 assuming there is no friction.

Homework Equations


I know you can use mgh = 1/2mv^2 to solve for velocity, but can you use vf^2 = vi^2 + 2(a)(d)

The Attempt at a Solution


If you use both equations you get the same answer for final velocity at the bottom of the ramp. However is the acceleration always 9.8 no matter what the shape of the ramp is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see any attempt to answer the question here. Think about forces.
 
Does it have to do with the normal force decreasing the force of gravity?
 
HHH said:
Does it have to do with the normal force decreasing the force of gravity?
Well, it doesn't decrease it, but it does partially oppose it.
 
so the acceleration would not be 9.8? if not why can you use both equations?

mgh = 1/2mv^2
(2)x(9.8)x(3) = 1/2 (2) v^2
v = 7.6m/s

vf^2 = vi^2 + 2ad
vf^2 = 0 + 2(9.8)(3)
v = 7.6m/s
 
HHH said:
so the acceleration would not be 9.8? if not why can you use both equations?

mgh = 1/2mv^2
(2)x(9.8)x(3) = 1/2 (2) v^2
v = 7.6m/s

vf^2 = vi^2 + 2ad
vf^2 = 0 + 2(9.8)(3)
v = 7.6m/s
Ignoring the fact that it's a ball for the moment, just treating it as a zero friction ramp, those (that) equation only tells you the final velocity. It doesn't tell you how long it takes to get there. The final velocity is the same whether dropped straight down or going down a ramp. It only depends on the PE lost. But it takes longer down the ramp, so the acceleration is less.

If it is a rolling ball, that starts off not rotating, then there is another issue. At the end some of the KE will be in rotational energy, so the linear velocity will be less.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AAAA and HHH
Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K