Find 1 RPM Motor for "Barn Door" Project!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cremer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motor Rpm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding a suitable motor for a "barn door" star tracking project that requires a speed of 1 RPM. Users suggest that a direct 1 RPM motor is hard to find, and instead recommend using a motor with a gearbox, such as a 6000:1 ratio, to achieve the desired speed. Concerns about torque and vibrations from stepper motors are raised, with some suggesting that a falling weight mechanism could provide smoother tracking. The importance of balancing the system and the potential for induced vibrations in optical setups are also highlighted. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for careful consideration of motor choice and mechanical design to ensure effective star tracking.
Cremer
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello all.

This is my first post as I need some help.

I'm building a "barn Door" project which I'm sure you all know is a device to track the stars.

With the measurements I've built it to I need to drive the screw at 1 RPM.

I'm finding it very hard to get a 1 RPM DC motor either 230v or 12v.

Does anyone know of a source?

If I went the route of a gearbox of say 6000:1 what speed motor would I
need to attach to this gearbox to obtain 1 RPM.

Problem is I would like ample torque as well.

Hope you can help.

Cremer
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Cremer said:
With the measurements I've built it to I need to drive the screw at 1 RPM.

I'm finding it very hard to get a 1 RPM DC motor either 230v or 12v.

Does anyone know of a source?

I would look at www.globalspec.com a search through the AC or DC motors. You'll never find a regular motor that runs at 1 rpm, you'll have to get a motor with a gearbox on it that reduces the shaft speed to your desired value.

Cremer said:
If I went the route of a gearbox of say 6000:1 what speed motor would I
need to attach to this gearbox to obtain 1 RPM.

A 6000rpm motor of course.

Cremer said:
Problem is I would like ample torque as well.

Torque is a more difficult issue, and will depend on the geometry and weight of the mechanism being moved.
 
Search on Gear Motors. You may also try Synchronous Gear Motors.
 
A better choice for this kind of application would be a stepper motor. You can turn them at pretty much any speed and they will be very accurate positionally. I would look around at suppliers to see if they have anything that will fit your specs.
 
Note that the problem of torque is largely self-solving due to the need for a large gear reduction for speed control, as long as the mount is going to be balanced.
 
It would seem like a stepper motor might tend to excite vibrations in the structure, not a good thing for an optical system.
 
Thanks guys and I'll look through those sites.

I did consider stepper motors but someone said that the steps to incite slight movement just like dr D has mentioned.
 
Dr.D said:
It would seem like a stepper motor might tend to excite vibrations in the structure, not a good thing for an optical system.
Stepper motors are used in highly accurate machining centers and the like. I have never heard of an induced vibration duer to one either. I am not quite sure how that would happen.
 
Telescope vibration, telescope motor vibration.

http://www.bbastrodesigns.com/vibration.html"

"Stepper motors snap from step to step when operating in fullstep or halfstep mode. This causes a jittery motion in the eyepiece that can be quite objectionable..."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
FredGarvin said:
Stepper motors are used in highly accurate machining centers and the like. I have never heard of an induced vibration duer to one either. I am not quite sure how that would happen.

Machining centers are usually very compact and stiff. Telescopes and other optical systems are often quite extensive (long dimensions) and necessarily not very stiff (too much weight) so that they cannot enjoy the stiffness of a machining center.
 
  • #12
Phrak said:
"Stepper motors snap from step to step when operating in fullstep or halfstep mode. This causes a jittery motion in the eyepiece that can be quite objectionable..."
Not by the time it's gone through a 600:1 gearbox!

Have you considered just a falling weight - historically it's worked pretty well for smooth star tracking.
 
  • #13
mgb_phys said:
Not by the time it's gone through a 600:1 gearbox!

Have you considered just a falling weight - historically it's worked pretty well for smooth star tracking.

The only thing the 600:1 gear box will add to the system is inertia. The frequency of the pulsations will go through the gear box unmodified, so that if it excites a structural resonance, you still have a problem.

The falling weight idea is a good one, provided that friction does not consume to much energy and does not develop stiction induced vibration.
 
  • #14
So say I did use a stepper motor...

I have a 1.8 degree 200 stepper motor which means that one step = 0.06 degree.

How do I get it to turn exactly 1 RPM

360 degree divide by 0.06 degree = 6000 steps.

I think I need help
 
Last edited:
  • #15
If you have a 200count stepper that bounces 1/2 step you are going to need a very tight gearbox for that frequency of movement to transmit through to the output shaft.

With a hanging weight you can always overcome friction (theres always more power available!) stiction could be a problem depending on what materials and machining services you have available.

OP - how big an instrument are you planning?
 
  • #16
Cremer said:
So say I did use a stepper motor...
I have a 1.8 degree 200 stepper motor which means that one step = 0.06 degree.
360 degree divide by 0.06 degree = 6000 steps.
I think you have got a little confused.
A 200count stepper moves 1/200 of a circle on each step, ie 200steps for a full circle or 1.8deg/step.

You can't drive your telescope directly becuase on each step it would jump 1.8deg.
Normally you would have a large arc with gear teeth on the edge and a worm gear so that one complete rotation of the worm gear moved the arc 1 tooth ( perhaps 0.05deg) then it's easy to run the motor at some reasonable number of rpm to give exactly the correct rotation speed and the whole thing is fairly smooth

An easier arrangement is to use a threaded rod and a moving nut attached to your telescope

tnt_alt.jpg


Description of a small system here http://home.att.net/~jsstars/slomo/slomo.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #17
  • #18
Don't use a curved rod - use a straight one and change the motor speed in software (trivial with a stepper)
For a camera you don't need sub-arc second tracking accuracy you can probably just have one speed for each 5-10deg altitude intervals.

In engineering the thing is also called a 'sine bar' because the change in the screw length is the sin of the angle.
 
  • #19
You may also consider antibacklash gearing.
 
Back
Top