Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around recommendations for physics textbooks suitable for reference and self-study. Participants share their experiences with various textbooks and express their needs for effective learning resources in physics.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant suggests Halliday and Resnick's "Fundamentals of Physics" as a standard recommendation for a general physics textbook.
- Another participant mentions using an older edition of Halliday and Resnick from the 1960s, indicating its lasting value.
- A third participant recommends both "University Physics" and "Fundamentals of Physics" as good options.
- A retired mechanical engineer expresses dissatisfaction with Ohanian's books, particularly regarding the lack of adequate solutions and guidance for the problems presented, questioning the existence of a better physics textbook that effectively teaches the material.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree on the recommendation of Halliday and Resnick as a solid choice, but there is disagreement regarding the effectiveness of Ohanian's books, with some expressing frustration over their instructional quality.
Contextual Notes
Some participants note the importance of having worked solutions for textbook problems, highlighting a potential gap in available resources for self-learners.
Who May Find This Useful
Individuals seeking physics textbooks for reference or self-study, particularly those with a background in engineering or those looking to refresh their knowledge in physics.