Find a Polynomial Function of Degree 5 with Roots: 2, √7, 5i, and -5i

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr. Mathmatics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Root
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a polynomial function of degree 5 with specified roots: 2, √7, 5i, and -5i. Participants explore the implications of having complex roots and the requirement for real coefficients in the polynomial.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of including both 5i and -5i as roots due to the requirement for real coefficients. There is also consideration of the multiplicity of roots and the implications of the problem statement allowing for multiple valid polynomials.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of polynomial roots and the flexibility in defining additional roots. Some guidance has been offered regarding the selection of roots to maintain real coefficients, while others question the clarity of the original problem statement.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of constraints regarding the coefficients of the polynomial being real integers, and participants are navigating the implications of this requirement while attempting to construct a valid polynomial.

Mr. Mathmatics
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find a Polynomial function of degree 5 whose zeros are: 2, radical 7, and 5i

Homework Equations


Multiplying roots

The Attempt at a Solution



Hello, well it's my first time at these forums so just following the template given. Thanks for any help by the way I'm just so confused.

I know that being given an imaginary number makes another root -5i automatically but the polynomial is a degree 5 with 5 roots. So my roots are (2, radical 7, 5i and -5i) I only have 4 and I don't really know any way to find the 5th.

I've already multiplied 5i and -5i to get one part of the polynomial but without the 5th root, I just can't finish. Anyone have any suggestions?

Thanks so much again.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just because a polynomial has 5i as a root doesn't mean that it must also have -5i as a root.

e.g. f(x) = x - 5i is a perfectly good polynomial function.

I don't see anything in your statement of the problem that requires those to be the only roots of your polynomial, or that they have to have multiplicity one.
 
Did you miss something in the question? i.e. the coefficient of the polynomial is restricted to real interger ...
 
Hurkyl; said:
Just because a polynomial has 5i as a root doesn't mean that it must also have -5i as a root.

e.g. f(x) = x - 5i is a perfectly good polynomial function.

I don't see anything in your statement of the problem that requires those to be the only roots of your polynomial, or that they have to have multiplicity one.

chanvincent; said:
Did you miss something in the question? i.e. the coefficient of the polynomial is restricted to real interger ...
chanvincent: I'm pretty sure she wants to keep the polynomial away from imaginary numbers.

Ahhh, good point I guess I can find any polynomial with those roots giving it any multiplicity I want since it says "a" polynomial function. Thanks for the speedy replies both of you.

But now I have a new problem I have x^4-6x^3+12x^2-8x and I have to multiply that by -5i and (x-radical 7) When I tried it, I was welcomed with a new imaginary polynomial. So is there any better way to multiplying this out, or am I just doing it wrong?

Thanks again
 
Last edited:
If your polynomial needs to have real coefficients then -5i does need to be a root. That's what Hurkyl and chanvincent were pointing out. I don't know where you got that quartic polynomial (0 is also a root) but you should probably pose this question a little more clearly.
 
From how you stated the question, I would say that more than one polynomial are solutions to this question.

"Find a polynomial" does not mean "Find the polynomial".
 
lalbatros said:
From how you stated the question, I would say that more than one polynomial are solutions to this question.

"Find a polynomial" does not mean "Find the polynomial".

Ha ha... a very good point... then the general solution would be:

(x-2)(x-\sqrt{7})(x-5i)(x-c_1)(x-c_2)

but then the question would become meaningless...

Ha ha :-p
 
Since you need to come up with two more zeroes, and the conjugate of (x - 5i) needs to be one of them (assuming your polynomial is to have real coefficients), use the conjugate of (x - sqrt(7)) as the other zero and it should be a little cleaner when you multiply.
 
Mr. Mathmatics said:
chanvincent: I'm pretty sure she wants to keep the polynomial away from imaginary numbers.

Ahhh, good point I guess I can find any polynomial with those roots giving it any multiplicity I want since it says "a" polynomial function. Thanks for the speedy replies both of you.

But now I have a new problem I have x^4-6x^3+12x^2-8x and I have to multiply that by -5i and (x-radical 7) When I tried it, I was welcomed with a new imaginary polynomial. So is there any better way to multiplying this out, or am I just doing it wrong?

Thanks again
Of course, if you multiply a polynomial with real coefficients by -5i, you will get a polynomial with imaginary coefficients. I doubt that you were told to "multiply by -5i". What really was the problem? Is this a completely new problem or more on the original?

As far as the first problem is concerned, yes, you must have (x-2)(x-\sqrt{7})(x-5i)(x-c_1)(x-c_2) but that certainly does not make the problem "meaningless"- choose c1 and c2 to be whatever you want. As you yourself said, the problem asks for "a" polynomial, not "the" polynomial. What others have been saying is that to make the polynomial as simple as possible, having not only real but integer coefficients, choose c_1= -5i and c_2= -\sqrt{7} so that your polynomial is (x-2)(x-\sqrt{7})(x+\sqrt{7})(x-5i)(x+5i).
 
  • #10
Of course, (x-2)(x-\sqrt{7})(x-5i)(x-c_1)(x-c_2) is a perfectly good polynomial anyway, and also quite a good solution to the question. It is a polynomial, regardless that you have not defined c_1 or c_2. Also, you lose no generality.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K