Find a power series for the function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a power series representation for the function f(x) = arctan(x/3) and determining its radius of convergence. The subject area includes calculus and series expansion techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the differentiation and integration of the function to derive the power series. There are attempts to clarify the correct form of the series and the implications of constants in the denominator. Questions arise regarding the proper setup of integrals and the impact of substitutions on the series representation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with each other's reasoning, pointing out potential errors in the formulation of the power series. There is a focus on ensuring the correct factors are included in the series representation, and some guidance has been offered regarding the integration process and the ratio test for determining the radius of convergence.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the integration steps and the application of the ratio test, with participants expressing uncertainty about the examples provided in their textbook. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to clarify these points without reaching a definitive conclusion.

  • #31
arl146 said:
Yea there's only 2 examples and they don't have any x's involved like mine. The book really doesn't show good examples in my opinion for reasons like that. The one examples is "test the series summation ((-1)^n * n^3)/(3^n) for absolute convergence." and all they have to do is do the ratio test, in which they get the limit equal to 1/3 which is obviously less than 1. The other examples is the same thing!

Anyways, the a sub n+1 part would equal x^(2(n+1)+1) on top so just x^(2n+3) and 3*(2(n+1)+1)*(9^n+1) on bottom. And that is multiplied times the a sub n part which is 3*(2n+1)*(9n) on top and x^(2n+1) on bottom. Sorry I can't throw this stuff all together in a better way, still on my phone. I simplified all that to ((x^2)*(2n+1))/(9*(2n+3)) and that's how I got my first part I gave you

Ok, so if you get x^2/9 for the limiting ratio, then what values of x will give you a convergent series?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Negative 3 and positive 3. Is this where I have to then check the end points which is just +3 and -3 like I said?
 
  • #33
arl146 said:
Negative 3 and positive 3. Is this where I have to then check the end points which is just +3 and -3 like I said?

Yes, you should check the endpoints.
 
  • #34
Ok and so for that I just have to plug in the endpoints into the series we found and I have to use the alternating series test for the convergence test of the endpoints right?
 
  • #35
arl146 said:
Ok and so for that I just have to plug in the endpoints into the series we found and I have to use the alternating series test for the convergence test of the endpoints right?

Yes, plug them in. Then use any test you have that applies to the series.
 
  • #36
ok so for x=3,we have summation (-1)^n * ((3^(2n+1))/(3*(2n+1)*(9^n)))
and for x=-3 we have summation (-1)^n * (((-3)^(2n+1))/(3*(2n+1)*(9^n)))

dont i have to use alternating series for this series though?

for the alternating series test the series has to satisfy 2 things:

(i.) the series with n+1 in replacement of all n's has to be <= the series when n just equals n
(ii.) limit of the series has to equal 0.

could you help me with completing this limit? i usually tend to go towards l'hospital's but i know in this case that wouldn't be a good route to take so how do i do the limit? i haven't done limits in quite some time. i know that i can take the limit of the top and bottom 'individually' so starting with the top, the x^(2n+1) part, am i able to just plug in n=infinity for the n? and if that's the case .. for the bottom, do i break that up into 2parts, the (2n+1) and the 9^n ? since i can just 'pull' the 1/3 out in front. and once i separate the bottom can i plug in the n=infinity into that too?

as for part (i.) ... i also don't exactly know how to tell if one is less than or greater than the other ... someone else was helping me with a problem like this and i just didnt understand
 
  • #37
arl146 said:
ok so for x=3,we have summation (-1)^n * ((3^(2n+1))/(3*(2n+1)*(9^n)))
and for x=-3 we have summation (-1)^n * (((-3)^(2n+1))/(3*(2n+1)*(9^n)))

dont i have to use alternating series for this series though?

for the alternating series test the series has to satisfy 2 things:

(i.) the series with n+1 in replacement of all n's has to be <= the series when n just equals n
(ii.) limit of the series has to equal 0.

could you help me with completing this limit? i usually tend to go towards l'hospital's but i know in this case that wouldn't be a good route to take so how do i do the limit? i haven't done limits in quite some time. i know that i can take the limit of the top and bottom 'individually' so starting with the top, the x^(2n+1) part, am i able to just plug in n=infinity for the n? and if that's the case .. for the bottom, do i break that up into 2parts, the (2n+1) and the 9^n ? since i can just 'pull' the 1/3 out in front. and once i separate the bottom can i plug in the n=infinity into that too?

as for part (i.) ... i also don't exactly know how to tell if one is less than or greater than the other ... someone else was helping me with a problem like this and i just didnt understand

Why haven't you at least tried to put the series in a simpler form? Like by using 3^(2n)=9^n??
 
  • #38
uhhh i don't know .. what does that help?
 
  • #39
arl146 said:
uhhh i don't know .. what does that help?

Simplifying a complicated expression usually helps you answer questions about it.
 
  • #40
well i don't know, seeing it at 3^(2n) doesn't really make anything click in my head anymore than 9^n does
 
  • #41
arl146 said:
well i don't know, seeing it at 3^(2n) doesn't really make anything click in my head anymore than 9^n does

There's a 3^(2n) in the numerator and there's a 9^n in the denominator. If you cancel them then you don't have to look at either one. I'm not sure what this debate about "why should I simplify" is accomplishing.
 
  • #42
ohhhh yea i forgot that i plugged in the 3 for the n on top that's why i was confused. but its a 3^(2n+1) so how do i cancel them.. I am just left with 1 on top and bottom then, right? so then I am left with it being 1/(3*(2n+1)) well really i have (1/3)*lim 1/(2n+1) right?
 
  • #43
arl146 said:
ohhhh yea i forgot that i plugged in the 3 for the n on top that's why i was confused. but its a 3^(2n+1) so how do i cancel them.. I am just left with 1 on top and bottom then, right? so then I am left with it being 1/(3*(2n+1)) well really i have (1/3)*lim 1/(2n+1) right?

Use algebra to figure out how 3^(2n+1) is related to 3^(2n). Are you doing this on your phone again or something? Is that what's going on with this short attention span thing? Get a piece of paper and work it out.
 
  • #44
yea i know, i just subtract the exponents. 2n+1-2n youre just left with 1. which is what i said. i mean unless that's wrong but that's what I've been doing and it worked for previous stuff
 
  • #45
arl146 said:
yea i know, i just subtract the exponents. 2n+1-2n youre just left with 1. which is what i said. i mean unless that's wrong but that's what I've been doing and it worked for previous stuff

1 is in the exponent of something. It's not just 1. This is getting pretty painful.
 
  • #46
i know i know sorrrrrry. i was thinking that the 3's cancel but they dont. so I am left with 3/(3*(2n+1)) ?
 
  • #47
arl146 said:
i know i know sorrrrrry. i was thinking that the 3's cancel but they dont. so I am left with 3/(3*(2n+1)) ?

They DO cancel. Why didn't you cancel them before? So you would get 1/(2n+1) if you weren't forgetting something else.
 
  • #48
yea i saw that but i was talking about something that is irrelevant at this point.

i see the 1/(2n+1) .. and for my endpoints one is + and the other -
im forgetting something else with simplifying?!
 
  • #49
arl146 said:
yea i saw that but i was talking about something that is irrelevant at this point.

i see the 1/(2n+1) .. and for my endpoints one is + and the other -
im forgetting something else with simplifying?!

Not with the simplification, you just left a factor behind several posts ago. Like usual.
 
  • #50
other than the (-1)^n i don't see anything
 
  • #51
arl146 said:
other than the (-1)^n i don't see anything

That's the one. So does it converge or diverge at the endpoints?
 
  • #52
ok, well the 'as usual' isn't even necessary, we were working on simplifying i wasnt concerned with that at the moment i didnt forget it, geez.

well, part 2 of the alternating series test is satisfied, the limit equals 0.
for part 1, it has to satisfy this: bn+1 <= bn

bn+1 = (-1)^n * \frac{1}{2n+3}
and so (-1)^n * \frac{1}{2n+3} is < (-1)^n * \frac{1}{2n+1}
so that is satisfied too .. so convergent on both endpoints
 
  • #53
arl146 said:
ok, well the 'as usual' isn't even necessary, we were working on simplifying i wasnt concerned with that at the moment i didnt forget it, geez.

well, part 2 of the alternating series test is satisfied, the limit equals 0.
for part 1, it has to satisfy this: bn+1 <= bn

bn+1 = (-1)^n * \frac{1}{2n+3}
and so (-1)^n * \frac{1}{2n+3} is < (-1)^n * \frac{1}{2n+1}
so that is satisfied too .. so convergent on both endpoints

Ok, sorry about the 'as usual'. But after 50+ posts on this I'm getting tired. Yes, it's convergent on both endpoints by the alternating series test. I could quibble about you leaving the (-1)^n in there when you are checking whether the absolute value of the terms are decreasing, but I'm going to let that one go.
 
  • #54
i think i am done with the problem then. the radius of convergence is 3?

im just saying, be more patient. people come here for help, not to feel stupid by the 'more intelligent' helpers. i appreciate your help but i definitely don't appreciate your attitude, and i shouldn't have to put up with it just because I am getting free help. thanks.
 
  • #55
arl146 said:
i think i am done with the problem then. the radius of convergence is 3?

im just saying, be more patient. people come here for help, not to feel stupid by the 'more intelligent' helpers. i appreciate your help but i definitely don't appreciate your attitude, and i shouldn't have to put up with it just because I am getting free help. thanks.

You are certainly entitled to your opinion. You are welcome.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K