Find a power series for the function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a power series representation for the function f(x) = arctan(x/3) and determining its radius of convergence. Participants work through the integration of the function and the correct formulation of the power series, clarifying the role of constants and exponents in the denominator. The final power series is established as the summation (-1)^n * x^(2n+1) / (3*(2n+1)*9^n). The radius of convergence is analyzed using the ratio test, leading to the conclusion that it converges for |x| < 3, with endpoints needing further examination for convergence. The discussion emphasizes the importance of careful manipulation of series terms and the application of convergence tests.
  • #51
arl146 said:
other than the (-1)^n i don't see anything

That's the one. So does it converge or diverge at the endpoints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
ok, well the 'as usual' isn't even necessary, we were working on simplifying i wasnt concerned with that at the moment i didnt forget it, geez.

well, part 2 of the alternating series test is satisfied, the limit equals 0.
for part 1, it has to satisfy this: bn+1 <= bn

bn+1 = (-1)^n * \frac{1}{2n+3}
and so (-1)^n * \frac{1}{2n+3} is < (-1)^n * \frac{1}{2n+1}
so that is satisfied too .. so convergent on both endpoints
 
  • #53
arl146 said:
ok, well the 'as usual' isn't even necessary, we were working on simplifying i wasnt concerned with that at the moment i didnt forget it, geez.

well, part 2 of the alternating series test is satisfied, the limit equals 0.
for part 1, it has to satisfy this: bn+1 <= bn

bn+1 = (-1)^n * \frac{1}{2n+3}
and so (-1)^n * \frac{1}{2n+3} is < (-1)^n * \frac{1}{2n+1}
so that is satisfied too .. so convergent on both endpoints

Ok, sorry about the 'as usual'. But after 50+ posts on this I'm getting tired. Yes, it's convergent on both endpoints by the alternating series test. I could quibble about you leaving the (-1)^n in there when you are checking whether the absolute value of the terms are decreasing, but I'm going to let that one go.
 
  • #54
i think i am done with the problem then. the radius of convergence is 3?

im just saying, be more patient. people come here for help, not to feel stupid by the 'more intelligent' helpers. i appreciate your help but i definitely don't appreciate your attitude, and i shouldn't have to put up with it just because I am getting free help. thanks.
 
  • #55
arl146 said:
i think i am done with the problem then. the radius of convergence is 3?

im just saying, be more patient. people come here for help, not to feel stupid by the 'more intelligent' helpers. i appreciate your help but i definitely don't appreciate your attitude, and i shouldn't have to put up with it just because I am getting free help. thanks.

You are certainly entitled to your opinion. You are welcome.
 
Back
Top